I was wondering when somebody was going to mention this. And given the fact that the "programmers" are part of the executive management team, I'd say the chance of a major change to this aspect of relationships is on par with the drought in California ending tomorrow. (I always thought that Millennia used job-shop or contract programmers. Wonder when that changed?)
Brian in CA -----Original Message----- From: MikeFry [mailto:emjay...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 11:36 AM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Any Way to Mark a PERSON as Never Married? On 2015/04/08 19:18 PM, John Lisle wrote: > One of the major knocks on Legacy by reviewers is that it does not > support same sex relationships. I happen to know that the data model > for Legacy was created long before the first gay marriage was legal in > the US and, unfortunately, changing this is not going to be easy, but > it is going to happen as so much of Legacy's customer base now needs > it. It is needed because Legacy is a Family History program and now > such relationships are becoming increasingly common within most folks > family history. I don't share your optimism that Legacy will be changed. The founders of the company are, I believe, LDS members and that fact would mitigate against such a change. -- Regards, Mike Fry (Jhb) Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
