Louise, I promised I wouldn't post on this subject again, but as one of the people who accidentally started this discussion with same sex couples etc. I just wanted to say that I agree with you 100%. I have been able to handle all of my unconventional family units through notes, events and tweaking the database through Access (which another list member helped me with).
And just to clarify something so that folks out in Legacy land don't think I'm a complete imbecile. I meant when a same sex couple ADOPTS a child. Aaron T. Gardner, M.A. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Louise Par Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Unmarried Mothers in Reports Anne, You said: > Sure we could go to a program who deals with these things better > tyhan Legacy does, but is that really in Legacy's best interest? > > Anne You (and others) talk like there are programs that do "these things" better than Legacy. I would really like to know which programs handles these things better than Legacy does. There have been numerous put downs of Legacy because it doesn't handle MANY things the way they think "these things" should be handled. Such as: 1. Adoptions 2. Single Adoptions 3. Same Sex Marriages 4. Child of Same Sex Couples (which is impossible) 5. Marriage (period) 6. Multiple Marriages 7. Step Children 8. Unmarried Mothers 9. Unmarried Fathers 10. Unmarried Couples 11. Never Married 12. Child Before Marriage 13. " After Marriage 14. " Before Divorce 15. " After Divorce The list could go ON-and-ON. I would REALLY like to know what programs handle "these things" better than Legacy. I, personally, don't think they could be handled too much better than Legacy handles them. These are all things that happen in life, some being the norm (so-to-speak) and some that is considered out of the norm, and some rarely happen. YET, they all, have happened and do happen in our lives and the lives of the ones we research. Some of us want to record just Genealogical Data. Some want to record Family History. But, I think most of us want to research and record Genealogical Data AND Family History. BUT.........we cannot expect Legacy (or any other program) to be able to handle all "those things" because the situations in all of "those things" are so varied that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to meet the needs of each one. This is the reason we have various NOTES sections, like Birth Notes, Death Notes, General Notes and etc. We, as researchers, must be willing to put the information in the Note fields that would tell the accurate story of our ancestors and our present life for the future generations. We cannot expect Legacy to be able to show all "those things" in the operation of the program. This is only my OPINION. I hope I have not offended anyone with this. Louise ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Hildrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 7:54 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Unmarried Mothers in Reports > > rom: "Michelle Safirstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > And if anyone is interested I do have a illegitment > > birth and it was my Grandfather. I have a pretty good > > idea who the mother was but there is no way I am > > putting that in notes or anywhere else. I would never > > put anything that could be untrue or slanderous in a > > Genealogy Program that could be read and used for > > years to come. > > Well some of us may have many illegitikmate births and > do know who both parents are, but they never married > > > > > If you look at these threads, especially the same-sex > > marriage, it is the same people time and time again > > that are speaking out. IMO, some people are trying to > > make a political statement. > > I am certainly not making a political statement when I would like > to have it reported correctly. I do have some of those happening, > it is a legal fact in several countries and I believe also in two? > states in the USA. Is it so wrong to hope for Legacy to be a product > we all feel happy to have? I don't need all the LSD stuff that there is, > but I have no problems that it is there just because I don't need it. > > Those who do need features says so, and why do the people who > don't need it complain, that there might come in something they don't need? > Sure we could go to a program who deals with these things better tyhan > Legacy does, > but is that really in Legacy's best interest? > > Anne > > > Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ > > To unsubscribe please visit: > http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp > Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
