Louise,

Best summation I've seen yet on the issues and the solution.  The anomalous
family situations some lament that Legacy does not handle well, or not at
all, are but a small percentage of the vast whole of society world-wide.

Glenn Woodman
Vancouver, Washington

----- Original Message -----
From: "Louise Par" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Unmarried Mothers in Reports


> Anne,
> You said:
>         > Sure we could go to a program who deals with these things better
>         > tyhan Legacy does, but is that really in Legacy's best interest?
>         >
>         > Anne
>
> You (and others) talk like there are programs that do "these things"
better
> than Legacy.  I would really like to know which programs handles these
> things better than Legacy does.  There have been numerous put downs of
> Legacy because it doesn't handle MANY things the way they think "these
> things" should be handled.  Such as:
>
> 1. Adoptions
> 2. Single Adoptions
> 3. Same Sex Marriages
> 4. Child of Same Sex Couples (which is impossible)
> 5. Marriage (period)
> 6. Multiple Marriages
> 7. Step Children
> 8. Unmarried Mothers
> 9. Unmarried Fathers
> 10. Unmarried Couples
> 11. Never Married
> 12. Child Before Marriage
> 13.    "     After Marriage
> 14.    "     Before Divorce
> 15.    "     After Divorce
>
> The list could go ON-and-ON.  I would REALLY like to know what programs
> handle "these things" better than Legacy.   I, personally, don't think
they
> could be handled too much better than Legacy handles them.
>
> These are all things that happen in life, some being the norm
(so-to-speak)
> and some that is considered out of the norm, and some rarely happen.  YET,
> they all, have happened and do happen in our lives and the lives of the
ones
> we research.  Some of us want to record just Genealogical Data.  Some want
> to record Family History.  But, I think most of us want to research and
> record Genealogical Data AND Family History.
>
> BUT.........we cannot expect Legacy (or any other program) to be able to
> handle all "those things" because the situations in all of "those things"
> are so varied that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to meet the needs of each one.
>
> This is the reason we have various NOTES sections, like Birth Notes, Death
> Notes, General Notes and etc.  We, as researchers, must be willing to put
> the information in the Note fields that would tell the accurate story of
our
> ancestors and our present life for the future generations.  We cannot
expect
> Legacy to be able to show all "those things" in the operation of the
> program.
>
> This is only my OPINION.  I hope I have not offended anyone with this.
>
> Louise
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anne Hildrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 7:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Unmarried Mothers in Reports
>
>
> >
> > rom: "Michelle Safirstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > And if anyone is interested I do have a illegitment
> > > birth and it was my Grandfather.  I have a pretty good
> > > idea who the mother was but there is no way I am
> > > putting that in notes or anywhere else.  I would never
> > > put anything that could be untrue or slanderous in a
> > > Genealogy Program that could be read and used for
> > > years to come.
> >
> > Well some of us may have many illegitikmate births and
> > do know who both parents are, but they never married
> >
> > >
> > > If you look at these threads, especially the same-sex
> > > marriage, it is the same people time and time again
> > > that are speaking out.  IMO, some people are trying to
> > > make a political statement.
> >
> > I am certainly not making a political statement when I would like
> > to have it reported correctly. I do have some of those happening,
> > it is a legal fact in several countries and I believe also in two?
> > states in the USA.  Is it so wrong to hope for Legacy to be a product
> > we all feel happy to have? I don't need all the LSD stuff that there is,
> > but I have no problems that it is there just because I don't need it.
> >
> > Those who do need features says so, and why do the people who
> > don't need it complain, that there might come in something they don't
> need?
> > Sure we could go to a program who deals with these things better tyhan
> > Legacy does,
> > but is that really in Legacy's best interest?
> >
> > Anne
> >
> >
> > Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
> > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> >
> > To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
> >
> > To unsubscribe please visit:
> > http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
> >
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
>
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to