On Wednesday 23 September 2020, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > GITNE's point was not about changeset data, it was about changeset > discussions. I agree there is no doubt that changesets are part of > the geodatabase (at least for me), but for changeset comments it > seems the situation isn't so clear, it could be seen as an edge case > (either way could be defended by arguments), athough I agree that > through linking it to the changeset_id it is within the geodatabase.
I see - yes, that is slightly different in nature - though i think all of the arguments i gave in principle still apply (including in particular that the OSMF publishes the changeset discussions under ODbL as well). The main difference i think is that contributions to changeset discussions have a higher likeliness to in themselves be subject to copyright (and not just database protection). -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
