Edward K. Ream wrote: > My wish is that we, individually and collectively, become connoisseurs > of evidence. And especially evidence that *disconfirms* our own > views.
Your view is that Global Warming "Science" is science Well then, you should go and look at the evidence that disconfirms that view, the evidence as to whether Global Warming "Science" is subject to the normal restraints, rules, and requirements of science: Here is the tale of his correspondence with the journal "Science" <http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=597> <http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=643> <http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=668> Which concludes: "This the 39th email in my correspondence with Science and I still don't have a complete record on either Esper et al 2002 or Osborn and Briffa 2006" Here <http://www.climateaudit.org/correspondence/cru.correspondence.pdf> is some more correspondence on two other bodies of secret data and mystery calculations, where Steve unsuccessfully attempts to get journals to follow their own policies that scientists who publish must make the data and calculations supporting their results available. There is plenty more where that came from - I just googled and skimmed the first few links. We now know that the reason he did not get the complete record for Briffa is that the crucial part of the record, the data that supposedly shows the twentieth century is substantially warmer than the last thousand years, was one cherry picked tree of ten cherry picked trees, which one remarkable tree has been revealed to have been much used in a wide variety of papers. The Esper data are still not available. If Global Warming Scientists can publish bare assertions and get away with it, as that correspondence proves, then, by the standards you have set forth, by the rules of what science is and how it should be conducted, by the unwritten rules accepted by all scientists, and the written rules set forth as journal policies, Global Warming is not science, but Gaean theology, Global Warming Scientists are not scientists, but Priests of Gaea, and the fact that they can publish in science journals is state sponsored and state enforced religion. > A) Science, which imposes harsh penalties for those who misstate the > truth, and rewards those who discover new kinds of valid evidence, or Yet again and again, Global Warmers have mistated the truth, most recently with the Yamal data. Far from being penalized, they have been rewarded with wealth, power, fame, the defunding and dismissal of their enemies, and state enforcement of their theology. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
