On 8/1/05, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One idea I have is to create a GCC4 branch of BLFS and as packages > are confirmed (or instructions updated to work) they are added into > this branch. The branch would essentially be empty of packages, with > the ones missing having instead a placeholder in place of the real > instructions. We would add real instructions as they are confirmed > to work. This wouldn't take a great deal of time and would not > interfere with trunk.
Based on my past experience with gcc upgrade, I plan to stay away from gcc-4.x till a 4.1 release :-) So a branch sounds good to me. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
