On 1/10/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > So, at the moment I have > > an aberrant build of perl in the first run of the fourth cycle, and at the > > moment I can't replicate it. > > Latest attempt to build this was fine, so I'll have to mark my problem > as "unconfirmed". Looks as if I've still got issues with groff-1.18.1 > postscript files, I assume that is my not matching something, so expect > yet another release of farce (001-7) soon.
They come back fine for me after the date replacement. Something like this: accepted /usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps after processing >From the ICA diffs: diff -ur iter1/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps iter2/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps --- iter1/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps 2006-01-08 21:24:18.000000000 -0800 +++ iter2/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps 2006-01-08 23:04:13.000000000 -0800 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ %!PS-Adobe-3.0 %%Creator: groff version 1.19.2 -%%CreationDate: Sun Jan 8 21:24:00 2006 +%%CreationDate: Sun Jan 8 23:03:55 2006 %%DocumentNeededResources: font Times-Roman %%+ font Times-Italic %%+ font Symbol Seems OK to me. Is this what you're seeing? -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
