M.Canales.es wrote: >> 1. The font on the headers doesn't seem right. Most of the text is >> standard serif fonts (computer modern?). That looks fine. The headers >> are sans-serif and bold. The bold seems a little too wide. > > My acroreader say that the used ones are this > > Arial-BoldMT > TimesNewRomanPSMT > TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT > TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT > Courier-Bold > Courier > Courier-Oblique > Courier-BoldOblique
Is this a function of the reader's system or the system that renders the pdf. I thought the actual fonts used were enclosed in the file. I'm not 100% sure though. >> 2. The highlighted text has borders that seem a little heavy. The >> notes have borders that are light gray. 'Important' and 'Caution' areas >> have the heavy border too. Perhaps removing the border completely from >> the gray backgrounds and using the light gray border for all the light >> yellow backgrounds would give a better visual appearance. > > The colors and border are the same than the ones used on the XHTML output. > The border could be changed from 1pc to 0.5pc to make ir less heavy, but in > resume I would to have the same look in both versions. 0.5pc? I think that's a pica which is 1 PostScript pica = 4.23333333 millimeters I don't think the borders are that thick--at least not on my system. My estimate is about 1 mm. Are you sure that's not the margin? Where is the border specified? Perhaps we could do some preprocessing for the pdf. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
