Greg Schafer wrote: > Sidenote: Now that some toolchain devs are apparently using *native* > sysroot builds, there is a temptation to pursue a whole new build method > that bypasses most of Ch 5. However, we would most certainly lose a lot of > the advantages of the current 2-phase approach, so gut instinct tells me > this won't be viable. Obviously, ICA verification would be *critical* to > such a build method.
About good separation of the files between different stages that was previously achieved by using /tools: I think that using a package manager would solve this. The advantage about immediately gaining these temporary tools in $PATH is indeed lost. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
