> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 01:36:21 +0100
> From: "Armin K." <[email protected]>
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Are we ready for LFS-7.5?
>
.
.
> >
> > I've just started sendmail. Actually I'm most interested in getting the
> > slackware issue settled for LFS. That's our only holdup for release.
> >
> > -- Bruce
>
> Why should we care when it's a distribution issue? Every "sane" distro
> works just fine except slackware. So let them fix it instead of us.
>
The real core of the issue is how gcc is looking for mpfr/mpc/gmp .
The lfs build approach for gcc is actually 'advised against' by at least
part of upstream: so maybe that needs reviewed, likely post-7.5 (cf also
Pierre's posts from earlier on Sat 1st); and gcc upstream could - _if_
they were at all like you - take a 'let LFS fix it' approach on any gcc
issues ("don't bug us unless you fix your build approach", etc).
rgds,
akh
> An errata entry should be fine. The other solution is to "rm $(grep -rl
> libgmp.la /usr/lib*/)" since the issue seems to come from another .la
> file which seems to pull libgmp.la, but the latter one isn't arround.
> --
>
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
