On 03/02/2014 08:55 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Armin K. wrote: >>> On 2.3.2014 2:55, akhiezer wrote: >> >>>>>> Why should we care when it's a distribution issue? Every "sane" distro >> >>>> It's not a 'distribution issue': you're wrong. >> >>> It is. Package ships *.la file that depends on another *.la file which >>> no package ships that the former one depends on. Packaging error. >> >> I have to agree with Armin on this point. An .la file is installed that >> depends on another file that is not installed. >> >> That said, I do think we need to address it in some way. Even if it's >> just a note. >> >> I took a look at http://sotirov-bg.net/slackpack/pack.cgi?id=1280 and >> the item 'SlackBuild: Yes, included' indicates to me that it should be >> present. >> >> It's really up to the user to install it though. We don't want to get >> into the business on advising how to install a package on a distro. >> >> A little googling suggests a check on slackware can be done with: >> >> find /var/log/packages -name gmp\* > > I think I have the test for version-check.sh: > > for lib in lib{gmp,mpfr,mpc}.so; do > echo $lib: $(if find /usr/lib* -name $lib| > grep -q $lib;then :;else echo not;fi) found > done > > Gives: > > libgmp.so: found > libmpfr.so: found > libmpc.so: found > > or > > libgmp.so: not found > libmpfr.so: found > libmpc.so: found > > All of the libraries may not be strictly required, but it errs on the > side of completeness. > > If I can get agreement on this, I can add it and make the 7.5 release > tomorrow (um, later today). > > -- Bruce >
Again, since it's a distribution specific issue, my recommendation is that it goes into errata. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
