linux fan wrote: > On 6/2/10, Danny Engelbarts <d.engelba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ... a 6.3 system is required than the book should state 6.3 until proven >> otherwise. > > That is just exactly what the DEV book now requires. > > Unfortunately, now we don't get to find out exactly why the original problem > "undefined reference to __stack_chk_guard" > surfaces from time to time.
I don't see why. It simply has to do with whether gcc provides the stack clobber check. It's not like there isn't any way to find information on it. I turned these up immediately... http://wiki.osdev.org/GCC_Stack_Smashing_Protector https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6657/ http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-07/msg00046.html Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
