On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:11:34AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36:07AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > True, but this patch fixes Doxygen generation without changing policy > > > about which parts of libav Doxygen documentation is extracted from. > > > Can we please apply this, fix the build, and settle the policy issue > > > separately? > > > > No. This patch attempts to fix a problem by explicitly enumerating > > everything that should _not_ be used by doxygen. Maintaining negative > > lists is always error-prone. It is better to list what _should_ be > > included. > > I don't see how it's that much more error-prone than maintaining a positive > list. Both lists have to be updated when directories get added or renamed. > At this point, a positive list would need to include all library dirs and > their subdirs, as well as the top level. That positive list has way more > entries and they change more frequently than we add non-library top-level > directories.
.. ping .. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
