Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:11:34AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36:07AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> > Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> > > True, but this patch fixes Doxygen generation without changing policy >> > > about which parts of libav Doxygen documentation is extracted from. >> > > Can we please apply this, fix the build, and settle the policy issue >> > > separately? >> > >> > No. This patch attempts to fix a problem by explicitly enumerating >> > everything that should _not_ be used by doxygen. Maintaining negative >> > lists is always error-prone. It is better to list what _should_ be >> > included. >> >> I don't see how it's that much more error-prone than maintaining a positive >> list. Both lists have to be updated when directories get added or renamed. >> At this point, a positive list would need to include all library dirs and >> their subdirs, as well as the top level. That positive list has way more >> entries and they change more frequently than we add non-library top-level >> directories. > > .. ping ..
The arguments against this still stand. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
