Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:27:23 -0800 From: Chester Prudhomme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Lib 100CT / Win2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:46:03 +0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [LIB] Lib 100CT / Win2000 > My "comparison" isn't a straight one, however - L110 with 64MB memory:- > > -- Win'98 on 4.3GB HDD - from memory (timed it once but can't find the > original post) - something like 2 minutes and a few odd seconds (2:06 rings > a bell) > > -- Win'2K on 30GB HDD - 90 seconds > > Win'2K shuts down a hell of a lot faster than '98 (and more reliably, too). After seeing this post about timing shutdown of Win2K on a L100 I ran the same timings on my L110 with Win2K as was done above with Win98 & Win2K. I found that my unit (with the original 4.3G HD and 64mb memory) was up and running in 1:25 seconds and shut down in 15 seconds! I have only had the L110 for a few weeks and am familiar with the Win2K OS from using it on my desktop but I don't see a lot of difference in its speed and facility on the Libretto. Someone mentioned some sites where one can find info about trimming the Win2K OS (and I would like to know more about this) but I can't imagine that it would work that much more efficiently in doing so? Why would 64mb's of memory work with Win2K more effectively in a L110 than a L100 - the smaller HD shouldn't have much of an influence at least for booting up - or does it? Chester ************************************************************** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **************************************************************
