Pete Batard wrote: > > Is it true also for Windows? > > The current code doesn't attempt to cache any descriptors for root hubs,
So the Windows USB stack does not provide root hub descriptors? (If so that's perfectly fine, I'm just trying to understand how Windows exposes the root hubs.) > Still, we currently do not try to poke root hubs for data during > enum on Windows, so, even if allowed, libusbx won't return much... The more I think about it the more I think that not exposing root hubs at all would be a good thing. By the way, 255 has special meaning in Wireless USB, as do 128-254. WUSB uses 16-bit addresses over the air, that may be why Windows uses unsigned short. //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
