On 2012.07.23 16:03, Peter Stuge wrote: > Communication takes two people, and when messages are interpreted to > mean something else than what was intended, time after time and with > no interest for clarifications, then saying that the sender is > trolling seems an odd proposition.
The problem is that I already explained in details why your reply was indeed trolling. If you want to dispute the fact, I can't help but find it very odd (yet not unexpected) that you conveniently choose to ignore the part where your trolling is most apparent, and the one were you are supposed to debunk the argument put forward, if you want to prove your point. Therefore, if you really want to pursue this game, and for the benefit of clarification, which you state you do have an interest for, pray clarify what your intent was behind "I speak for the libusb project with my 8 years of experience there, not for the libusbx fork of a few months which is ran by Pete." I fail to see any way to interpret this is a way that where the intend isn't to cast a negative light for the libusbx project. Still, feel free to explain how one was supposed to interpret this in a non-trolling fashion, and why you felt such a statement was so important to mention for the issue at hand, as well as how it relates to it. You have been given ample chance for clarification, so stop playing the offended party every time someone points out your obvious intent and start assuming what you write. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
