On 26/11/12 22:54, Pete Batard wrote: > On 2012.11.26 13:34, Toby Gray wrote: >> Excellent. I'll try to find time to do some improvements and possibly >> even add some tests which perform some IO. My thinking for tests which >> require particular types of devices would be that they get marked as >> skipped if you don't have suitable devices connected. > Since Xiaofan hasn't intervened yet, I'll just point out that we have an > implementation of a Benchmark device for PIC and AVR, that could come > handy for such tests [1]. This is mostly used for libusbK, but in case > you are undecided on the kind of target devices you could use for > libusbx tests, I thought I'd mention that one. > > [1]http://code.google.com/p/usb-travis/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2FBmFW >
Using a special device sounds like a good idea, especially as there are already a selection of different firmwares available. Is there a particular pre-made board that contains a suitable PIC or AVR chip that people would recommend? Regards, Toby ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
