license-discuss

Messages by Date

2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Russell McOrmond
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Martijn Verburg
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Simon Phipps
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Rick Moen
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI John Cowan
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Martijn Verburg
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI John Cowan
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Russell McOrmond
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Lawrence Rosen
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI James
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Pamela Chestek
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Pamela Chestek
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Rick Moen
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Lawrence Rosen
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Russell McOrmond
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Richard Fontana
2019/05/25 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Pamela Chestek
2019/05/24 Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/05/24 [License-discuss] Evolving the License Review process for OSI Pamela Chestek
2019/05/24 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Henrik Ingo
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Rick Moen
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Richard Fontana
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Richard Fontana
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Lawrence Rosen
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list VanL
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] moderator information outdated Pamela Chestek
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Rick Moen
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Lawrence Rosen
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Smith, McCoy
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Richard Fontana
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list John Cowan
2019/05/23 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Rick Moen
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Rick Moen
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Lawrence Rosen
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list John Cowan
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Rick Moen
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Henrik Ingo
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Richard Fontana
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/05/22 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Henrik Ingo
2019/05/21 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
2019/05/21 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Richard Fontana
2019/05/21 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
2019/05/21 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Henrik Ingo
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list John Cowan
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list VanL
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Smith, McCoy
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list VanL
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Smith, McCoy
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list VanL
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] moderator information outdated Simon Phipps
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] moderator information outdated Brendan Hickey
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Simon Phipps
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Smith, McCoy
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] VanL
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Ben Hilburn
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Scott Peterson
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list Ben Hilburn
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Richard Fontana
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Pamela Chestek
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/05/20 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Pamela Chestek
2019/05/19 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
2019/05/19 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Richard Fontana
2019/05/19 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Henrik Ingo
2019/05/18 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Stephen Paul Weber
2019/05/18 Re: [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Richard Fontana
2019/05/18 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Luis Villa
2019/05/18 [License-discuss] comprehensiveness (or not) of the OSI-approved list [was Re: [License-review] For Legacy Approval: LBNL BSD] Luis Villa
2019/05/18 Re: [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Richard Fontana
2019/05/18 Re: [License-discuss] The Scope of the OSD (Was For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License) Richard Fontana
2019/05/14 [License-discuss] Don't respond Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/05/14 [License-discuss] Can a contributor take back open source code ? - Yes, if he has not signed over the copyright. informator
2019/05/13 [License-discuss] history of l-r/org relationship [was Re: [License-review] For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License] Luis Villa
2019/05/13 [License-discuss] The Scope of the OSD (Was For Approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License) Pamela Chestek
2019/05/09 Re: [License-discuss] Open Sourcing a SW with the GUI based on proprietary libraries Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/05/09 [License-discuss] Open Sourcing a SW with the GUI based on proprietary libraries Paolo Palazzari
2019/05/06 [License-discuss] April 2019 Summary Lukas Atkinson
2019/05/02 [License-discuss] FAQs/steward links on opensource.org? Luis Villa
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and Apache 2 Compatibility Thorsten Glaser
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bryan Christ
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Smith, McCoy
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bryan Christ
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bryan Christ
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bryan Christ
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bryan Christ
2019/04/25 Re: [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bruce Perens via License-discuss
2019/04/25 [License-discuss] Question about LGPL 2.1 and APL 2.0 Compatibility Bryan Christ
2019/04/24 Re: [License-discuss] Can a contributor take back open source code ? Antoine Thomas
2019/04/24 Re: [License-discuss] Can a contributor take back open source code ? Brendan Hickey
2019/04/24 Re: [License-discuss] Can a contributor take back open source code ? Kevin P. Fleming
2019/04/24 [License-discuss] Can a contributor take back open source code ? Antoine Thomas
2019/04/19 [License-discuss] Non-Commercial doesn't compose (and it never will) [now on the right list] Christopher Lemmer Webber
2019/04/14 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Richard Fontana
2019/04/01 [License-discuss] March 2019 Summary Lukas Atkinson
2019/03/31 Re: [License-discuss] International licenses redux Richard Fontana
2019/03/28 Re: [License-discuss] GPL developer protections: Is limitation/disclaimer of warranty legally non-binding? Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/26 Re: [License-discuss] GPL developer protections: Is limitation/disclaimer of warranty legally non-binding? VanL
2019/03/25 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Luis Villa
2019/03/25 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Henrik Ingo
2019/03/25 Re: [License-discuss] Are limitation/disclaimer of warranty clauses legally non-binding due to missing browsewrap/clickwrap agreement? Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/25 [License-discuss] GPL developer protections: Is limitation/disclaimer of warranty legally non-binding? Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/24 Re: [License-discuss] Are limitation/disclaimer of warranty clauses legally non-binding due to missing browsewrap/clickwrap agreement? Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/24 [License-discuss] Are limitation/disclaimer of warranty clauses legally non-binding due to missing browsewrap/clickwrap agreement? Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/23 [License-discuss] The GPL Meets the UCC: Does Free Software Come with a Warranty of No Infringement of Patents and Copyrights? Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/22 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Bruce Perens
2019/03/22 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Richard Fontana
2019/03/21 Re: [License-discuss] Doese GPLv3 allow misrepresentation and grant rights under trademark law? Bruce Perens
2019/03/21 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Rick Moen
2019/03/21 Re: [License-discuss] Doese GPLv3 allow misrepresentation and grant rights under trademark law? John Cowan
2019/03/21 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Michael Downey
2019/03/21 [License-discuss] Doese GPLv3 allow misrepresentation and grant rights under trademark law? Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/21 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License VanL
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Luis Villa
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Bruce Perens
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Chris Jerdonek
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Pamela Chestek
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Bruce Perens
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Richard Fontana
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Henrik Ingo
2019/03/20 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Henrik Ingo
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Bruce Perens
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Florian Weimer
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Bruce Perens
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Intimacy in open source (SSPL and AGPL) Florian Weimer
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor Bruce Perens
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Florian Weimer
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor Luis Villa
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Rick Moen
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Chris Jerdonek
2019/03/19 [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy Bruce Perens
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor Chris Jerdonek
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Rick Moen
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Rick Moen
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor VanL
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License John Cowan
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License VanL
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor Pamela Chestek
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Luis Villa
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Discourse hosting Kevin P. Fleming
2019/03/19 Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Rick Moen
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Luis Villa
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor John Sullivan
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Bruce Perens
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Thorsten Glaser
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Bruce Perens
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Bruce Perens
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Henrik Ingo
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License VanL
2019/03/18 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor John Cowan
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Richard Fontana
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of tools Ben Hilburn
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Bruce Perens
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Bruce Perens
2019/03/17 [License-discuss] Seeking public comments for the OpenChain Specification version 2.0 Gisi, Mark
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] moderator information outdated Andrew DeMarsh
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Andrew DeMarsh
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor John Cowan
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor VanL
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License VanL
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License VanL
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License VanL
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor Bruce Perens
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor Bruce Perens
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/03/17 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Tzeng, Nigel H.
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Bruce Perens
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Bruce Perens
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Bruce Perens
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Bruce Perens
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Bruce Perens
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Bruce Perens
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Lawrence Rosen
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Henrik Ingo
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License Henrik Ingo
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Bruce Perens
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Richard Fontana
2019/03/16 [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)] Richard Fontana
2019/03/16 [License-discuss] Why GPLv3 does not have a indemnification clause by default? Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/16 [License-discuss] moderator information outdated Patrick Schleizer
2019/03/16 Re: [License-discuss] The per se license constructor Patrick Schleizer