>> I vote for \broken. For me, it doesn't imply two pieces. This was >> David's first, quick suggestion, and I think it's good for exactly >> this reason. > > when I see \broken\< or \broken\!, this does not really help me > figure out where to use them. \broken\! actually looks, uh, broken. > How do you break an end spanner? > > However, \fake\< or \fake\! immediately make clear that we are > talking about something still being used in the function of a > starting and ending spanner, respectively. I like it somewhat > better than \detached, but of course the latter is a bit more > dignified. It's also longer.
Hmm, I don't like \detached. It has no connection to a partial slur whatsoever. Since \partial is already taken, what about \cut? The spanner gets cut a bit, right? Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel