>> I vote for \broken. For me, it doesn't imply two pieces. This was
>> David's first, quick suggestion, and I think it's good for exactly
>> this reason.
>
> when I see \broken\< or \broken\!, this does not really help me
> figure out where to use them. \broken\! actually looks, uh, broken.
> How do you break an end spanner?
>
> However, \fake\< or \fake\! immediately make clear that we are
> talking about something still being used in the function of a
> starting and ending spanner, respectively. I like it somewhat
> better than \detached, but of course the latter is a bit more
> dignified. It's also longer.
Hmm, I don't like \detached. It has no connection to a partial slur
whatsoever. Since \partial is already taken, what about \cut? The
spanner gets cut a bit, right?
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
