> I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
> the given example
>
> g f e d(
> \repeat { c d) e f ( }
> \alternatives {
> { g) a b( a \fake) }
> { \fake( e) d c( d \fake) }
> { \fake( d) c d( e }
> }
> d c) d c
Hmm. It's not clear to me why lilypond can't handle this
automatically:
g f e d(
\repeat { c d) e f( }
\alternatives {
{ g) a b( a }
{ e) d c( d }
{ d) c d( e }
}
d c) d c
I thought that Mike's patch is implementing exactly that...
It seems that I've *completely* misunderstood the syntax we were
talking about, so thanks for this detailed example. However, I still
don't like \fake. Looking at your syntax about, the corresponding TeX
name would be \phantom which I do now suggest.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
