On 20 March 2013 12:35, <ianhuli...@gmail.com> wrote: > \fake and \broken are concise but "feel" wrong, implying something's > wrong with something else but the name doesn't describe it. > > I think a function name where we've got to resort to being clever maybe > indicate we're trying to solve the wrong problem: we're trying to make > the name short at the expense of descriptiveness. Brevity is good, but a > top-level LilyPond function name has to describe what it does reasonably > accurately. >
\pointAndClickOff :) James
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
