Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes:
>> If the design needs it at both ends of the repeated block you could
>> consider a single keyword parameter for the function,
>>
>> o \slurInRepeat #'begin - to appear at the end of the block and
>> indicate you're starting a new, partial slur and
>>
>> o \slurInRepeat #'complete - to appear at the beginning of the block
>> and indicate you need to generate the rest of of the slur.
>>
>> This would also fit better with the current set of \slur* commands
>> which are basically slur property setter commands e.g. \slurDotted
>> \slurUp \slurSolid.
>
> For me, this is too verbose. What about
>
> \leftPart(
> \rightPart)
>
> or
>
> \leftPartOf(
> \rightPartOf)
>
> ? This should be quite universal for all spanners.
I think any further proposals should _definitely_ explain how to write
the given example
g f e d(
\repeat { c d) e f ( }
\alternatives {
{ g) a b( a \fake) }
{ \fake( e) d c( d \fake) }
{ \fake( d) c d( e }
}
d c) d c
with them. According to what you wrote above, this would probably
become
g f e d(
\repeat { c d) e f ( }
\alternatives {
{ g) a b( a \rightPart) }
{ \leftPart( e) d c( d \rightPart) }
{ \leftPart( d) c d( e }
}
d c) d c
I have no idea what "rightPart" is supposed to mean here and why ( on
its own would _not_ be a left part of anything. We also have no matchup
of left and right parts: the \rightPart in the first alternative is the
visual match of a paren not called \leftPart, and it connects logically
to the closing paren in the \repeat phrase which is not called any part
either.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
