Town meeting is special, a chance to discuss and decide on issues. The
camaraderie is cathartic after intense pre-election debating.

However, when it comes time to vote, i think emotion should not play a role
and therefore I prefer electronic voting. I trust my fellow residents to do
their homework and come prepared to cast a ballot.

Rob Ahlert
185 Lincoln Road

*Robert Ahlert* | *781.738.1069* | robahl...@gmail.com


On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:00 PM Laura Crosby <lauracros...@comcast.net>
wrote:

> I’m 100% in agreement in purchasing
> electronic voting devices. Valerie
> Fox is also in agreement.
> We lost close to two hours
> at the recent Special Town
>  Meeting waiting for votes to be
> counted.
>  Many left after first vote due
> to timing issues.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 12, 2023, at 6:47 PM, Scott Clary <scottclar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Peter and Andy,
>
> Thank you for detailing a plan for revampment of our voting system that
> makes so much sense. It really is a no-brainer. And the percentages broken
> down by age that Peter provided are quite telling.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Scott Clary
> 617-968-5769
>
> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 6:17 PM Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A town meeting is an all day plus affair which disenfranchises many
>> younger voters with families and other voters who are unable to attend all
>> day meetings.
>>
>> At our last special town meeting in early December we had 878 voters
>> check-in with the following distribution of voters by age.
>> 18-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
>> 2% 5% 14% 16% 23% 24% 16%
>>
>> With only 640ish cast ballots for preference votes for the Community
>> Center and HCA rezoning, we lost 16/% of our checked-in voters as many
>> didn't stay to participate in both important votes.  Please note that only
>> 21% of the vote is 49 or under.
>>
>>
>> With a poor representation of our younger residents, We need to revamp
>> our Town Meetings to better engage our 4876 registered voters.  Certain
>> votes require 2/3 of a town meeting and with such poor voter turnout, the
>> power of a few well organized groups can dominate the decisions of the town
>> unjustly.
>>
>> I propose
>> 1) The town should purchase electronic voting devices to speed up all
>> town meetings.  At least 60 towns in the commonwealth already successfully
>> use these devices.  I bet we could save at least a couple of hours at each
>> town meeting by using this proven technology. List of Mass Towns
>> <https://www.meridiaars.com/electronic-voting-system-in-massachusetts-towns/>
>>
>>
>> 2)  We should explore Andy Wang's earlier suggestion of separating the
>> debate/amend parts of a Town Meeting from the voting part.  The town should
>> create a working group to explore the many different ways to increase voter
>> participation at Town Meetings.  Maybe we can even get this new style of
>> Town Meeting ready for our March meeting.
>>
>> Many towns like Concord have town meetings that last several days and
>> have even poorer voter participation than ours Concord Town Meeting
>> Participation
>> <https://concordma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/43398/TOWN-MEETING-VOTER-PARTICIPATION-1997-2023>.
>> The working group should explore separating the time consuming parts of a
>> Town Meeting from the voting part.   The first day of the Town Meeting
>> could work through, amend and debate all contentious warrants up to an
>> actual vote.  At a certain point when a warrant is ready to vote, the
>> moderator should table the vote until the continuation of the 2nd day of
>> the town meeting.  Information about the 1st day's work will be posted
>> online with a video that voters would be able to review.  The 2nd day of
>> only voting would be a couple of days after the first and begin at a set
>> time and be finished hopefully after only spending a couple of minutes per
>> vote if the Town purchases electronic voting devices.
>>
>> Peter Buchthal
>> Weston Rd
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:01 AM Andy Wang <andyrw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As of March, according to the election results.
>>> <29AFF794-562A-4589-B5F3-D20DB548516B.png>
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:36 AM Garrick Niemiec <
>>> garrickniemiec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 9:52 PM Garrick Niemiec <
>>>> garrickniemiec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 5000 voters are on record
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 9:36 PM Barbara Low <barbara_...@hotmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought there were about 5000 residents, not voters.
>>>>>>  Does anyone know the actual number of voters?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
>>>>>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> *From:* Lincoln <lincoln-boun...@lincolntalk.org> on behalf of Sara
>>>>>> Mattes <samat...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, December 11, 2023 8:22:46 PM
>>>>>> *To:* Garrick Niemiec <garrickniemiec...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> *Cc:* Lincoln Talk <lincoln@lincolntalk.org>
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [LincolnTalk] Wow 800 Lincoln folk vote at STM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most towns do NOT do this.
>>>>>> Laws which govern Open Town Meeting towns  are the determining
>>>>>> factors.
>>>>>> Perhaps all who want to come up with some new concepts should get
>>>>>> together, like LRHA, and research and propose to the town.
>>>>>> That would be really instructive and constructive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> March will have a ballot, in addition to the TM vote -to approve the
>>>>>> $$ for the Community Center.
>>>>>> One could skip TM and simply vote at the ballot box the following
>>>>>> Monday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again, I urge all who are interested in this issue to form a study
>>>>>> group and see what options are available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------
>>>>>> Sara Mattes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 11, 2023, at 8:09 PM, Garrick Niemiec <
>>>>>> garrickniemiec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I couldn't disagree more...we need to make voting accessable...time
>>>>>> for change Sara.. time for change now. Let us vote electronically...all 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> us remotely.  C'mon most towns do it now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New comers including  my family all recognize this!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The system is sooo antiquated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Join us now before the march town meeting fails us again!  Again and
>>>>>> again and again!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a good friend said at STM we are not spending our money wisely!
>>>>>> You know that...a school project for 30M turns into 100 M. Driven by
>>>>>> current Lincoln politics including selects.  Yikes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now RLF is bankrupt? What's going on here.  We're in a tailspin.  Any
>>>>>> ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 6:53 PM Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Garrick,
>>>>>> Town Meeting is open to all who care enough to attend.
>>>>>> It not a drive-by!
>>>>>> When people make noise about wanting a secret ballot at a ballot box,
>>>>>> there is no evidence that indicates a huge leap in participation!
>>>>>> I don’t like the way thing unfolded or the (predictable) outcome, but
>>>>>> it was not because voting was not available tall.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------
>>>>>> Sara Mattes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 11, 2023, at 5:53 PM, Garrick Niemiec <
>>>>>> garrickniemiec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5000 are registered voters...this is NOT the Lincoln way!!!
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>>> Browse the archives at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to