I agree...it's not why we can't, it's how we can!  Go for it!

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 8:14 AM ٍSarah Postlethwait <sa...@bayhas.com> wrote:

> Jim-
> Thanks so much for taking the lead on revamping Lincoln’s town meeting
> process. It’s truly appreciated!
>
> Sarah Postlethwait
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 7:25 AM Jim Hutchinson <jmhut...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi to all those interested in voting technology and process,
>>
>>
>>
>> We’ll be discussing these sorts of issues at tonight’s Select Board
>> meeting, reviewing the Town Clerk’s proposal for “clickers” that
>> electronically tabulate town meeting votes, as well as having a preliminary
>> discussion of other possible meeting/process improvements. We’ll briefly
>> review changes that we’ve tried in the past, ideas other towns have tried
>> or are thinking about such as remote voting, suggestions we’ve heard from
>> you, and what state law says about all this, as we think about whether and
>> how we should go about such changes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Our meeting starts at 6:30pm tonight, although I’ll warn you there are a
>> few things on our agenda before the above topic. See agenda here
>> <https://www.lincolntown.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_12182023-5384>
>> and zoom link below, and note this discussion will be during the “Special
>> Town Meeting Reflections” item, which we may pull forward to just before
>> the public comment period.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you can’t make tonight’s meeting, feel free to reach out to me
>> directly on this topic, especially if you’re inclined to help investigate
>> or push forward an initiative!
>>
>>
>>
>> -jim
>>
>>
>>
>> Topic: Lincoln Select Board Meeting
>>
>> Time: December 18, 2023, 06:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)
>>
>> Join Zoom Meeting
>>
>> https://zoom.us/j/91832375325?pwd=aXRpdnlJWHJINnZzd0xOQW9ZTjIvdz09
>>
>>
>>
>> *Meeting ID: 918 3237 5325*
>>
>> *Passcode: 378902*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Lincoln <lincoln-boun...@lincolntalk.org> *On Behalf Of *Fil
>> Zembowicz
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 12, 2023 9:28 PM
>> *To:* Robert Ahlert <robahl...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* Lincoln Talk <lincoln@lincolntalk.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [LincolnTalk] Wow 800 Lincoln folk vote at STM
>>
>>
>>
>> As a 30-something (I guess under-represented?) software developer
>> (over-represented?) in town, I found the inefficiency of the mechanics of
>> the tallying process the frustrating part of the meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hearing the presentations and public comments is amazing and something I
>> find very valuable. Sitting around waiting for addition to happen manually
>> is another matter...
>>
>>
>>
>> It's 2023 ... we could trivially have a system whereby each voter
>> attending the meeting (or not?) is given a unique link via text message or
>> email at which they can input their vote (once) on their phone, while
>> providing summary statistics to the moderator in real time. I can't imagine
>> this is a new idea, there are surely vendors that provide this service to
>> numerous states and municipalities. This is not a "hard problem", it would
>> take a weekend to build a simple version of this. I would be happy to
>> advise on / help implement such a thing if there is motivation to do so.
>>
>>
>>
>> Fil
>>
>> 16 Minebrook Rd
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:19 PM Robert Ahlert <robahl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Town meeting is special, a chance to discuss and decide on issues. The
>> camaraderie is cathartic after intense pre-election debating.
>>
>>
>>
>> However, when it comes time to vote, i think emotion should not play a
>> role and therefore I prefer electronic voting. I trust my fellow residents
>> to do their homework and come prepared to cast a ballot.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob Ahlert
>>
>> 185 Lincoln Road
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/185+Lincoln+Road?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> *Robert Ahlert* | *781.738.1069* | robahl...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:00 PM Laura Crosby <lauracros...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m 100% in agreement in purchasing
>>
>> electronic voting devices. Valerie
>>
>> Fox is also in agreement.
>>
>> We lost close to two hours
>>
>> at the recent Special Town
>>
>>  Meeting waiting for votes to be
>>
>> counted.
>>
>>  Many left after first vote due
>>
>> to timing issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 12, 2023, at 6:47 PM, Scott Clary <scottclar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Peter and Andy,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for detailing a plan for revampment of our voting system that
>> makes so much sense. It really is a no-brainer. And the percentages broken
>> down by age that Peter provided are quite telling.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Scott Clary
>> 617-968-5769
>>
>> Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023, 6:17 PM Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> A town meeting is an all day plus affair which disenfranchises many
>> younger voters with families and other voters who are unable to attend all
>> day meetings.
>>
>>
>>
>> At our last special town meeting in early December we had 878 voters
>> check-in with the following distribution of voters by age.
>>
>> *18-29*
>>
>> *30-39*
>>
>> *40-49*
>>
>> *50-59*
>>
>> *60-69*
>>
>> *70-79*
>>
>> *80+*
>>
>> 2%
>>
>> 5%
>>
>> 14%
>>
>> 16%
>>
>> 23%
>>
>> 24%
>>
>> 16%
>>
>>
>>
>> With only 640ish cast ballots for preference votes for the Community
>> Center and HCA rezoning, we lost 16/% of our checked-in voters as many
>> didn't stay to participate in both important votes.  Please note that only
>> 21% of the vote is 49 or under.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> With a poor representation of our younger residents, We need to revamp
>> our Town Meetings to better engage our 4876 registered voters.  Certain
>> votes require 2/3 of a town meeting and with such poor voter turnout, the
>> power of a few well organized groups can dominate the decisions of the town
>> unjustly.
>>
>>
>>
>> I propose
>>
>> 1) The town should purchase electronic voting devices to speed up all
>> town meetings.  At least 60 towns in the commonwealth already successfully
>> use these devices.  I bet we could save at least a couple of hours at each
>> town meeting by using this proven technology. List of Mass Towns
>> <https://www.meridiaars.com/electronic-voting-system-in-massachusetts-towns/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2)  We should explore Andy Wang's earlier suggestion of separating the
>> debate/amend parts of a Town Meeting from the voting part.  The town should
>> create a working group to explore the many different ways to increase voter
>> participation at Town Meetings.  Maybe we can even get this new style of
>> Town Meeting ready for our March meeting.
>>
>>
>> Many towns like Concord have town meetings that last several days and
>> have even poorer voter participation than ours Concord Town Meeting
>> Participation
>> <https://concordma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/43398/TOWN-MEETING-VOTER-PARTICIPATION-1997-2023>.
>> The working group should explore separating the time consuming parts of a
>> Town Meeting from the voting part.   The first day of the Town Meeting
>> could work through, amend and debate all contentious warrants up to an
>> actual vote.  At a certain point when a warrant is ready to vote, the
>> moderator should table the vote until the continuation of the 2nd day of
>> the town meeting.  Information about the 1st day's work will be posted
>> online with a video that voters would be able to review.  The 2nd day of
>> only voting would be a couple of days after the first and begin at a set
>> time and be finished hopefully after only spending a couple of minutes per
>> vote if the Town purchases electronic voting devices.
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter Buchthal
>>
>> Weston Rd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:01 AM Andy Wang <andyrw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> As of March, according to the election results.
>>
>> <29AFF794-562A-4589-B5F3-D20DB548516B.png>
>>
>>
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:36 AM Garrick Niemiec <
>> garrickniemiec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 9:52 PM Garrick Niemiec <
>> garrickniemiec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 5000 voters are on record
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 9:36 PM Barbara Low <barbara_...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I thought there were about 5000 residents, not voters.
>>
>>  Does anyone know the actual number of voters?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Lincoln <lincoln-boun...@lincolntalk.org> on behalf of Sara
>> Mattes <samat...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, December 11, 2023 8:22:46 PM
>> *To:* Garrick Niemiec <garrickniemiec...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* Lincoln Talk <lincoln@lincolntalk.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [LincolnTalk] Wow 800 Lincoln folk vote at STM
>>
>>
>>
>> Most towns do NOT do this.
>>
>> Laws which govern Open Town Meeting towns  are the determining factors.
>>
>> Perhaps all who want to come up with some new concepts should get
>> together, like LRHA, and research and propose to the town.
>>
>> That would be really instructive and constructive.
>>
>>
>>
>> March will have a ballot, in addition to the TM vote -to approve the $$
>> for the Community Center.
>>
>> One could skip TM and simply vote at the ballot box the following Monday.
>>
>>
>>
>> Again, I urge all who are interested in this issue to form a study group
>> and see what options are available.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Sara Mattes
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2023, at 8:09 PM, Garrick Niemiec <garrickniemiec...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I couldn't disagree more...we need to make voting accessable...time for
>> change Sara.. time for change now. Let us vote electronically...all of us
>> remotely.  C'mon most towns do it now.
>>
>>
>>
>> New comers including  my family all recognize this!
>>
>>
>>
>> The system is sooo antiquated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Join us now before the march town meeting fails us again!  Again and
>> again and again!
>>
>>
>>
>> As a good friend said at STM we are not spending our money wisely!  You
>> know that...a school project for 30M turns into 100 M. Driven by current
>> Lincoln politics including selects.  Yikes!
>>
>>
>>
>> Now RLF is bankrupt? What's going on here.  We're in a tailspin.  Any
>> ideas?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023, 6:53 PM Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Garrick,
>>
>> Town Meeting is open to all who care enough to attend.
>>
>> It not a drive-by!
>>
>> When people make noise about wanting a secret ballot at a ballot box,
>> there is no evidence that indicates a huge leap in participation!
>>
>> I don’t like the way thing unfolded or the (predictable) outcome, but it
>> was not because voting was not available tall.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Sara Mattes
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2023, at 5:53 PM, Garrick Niemiec <garrickniemiec...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 5000 are registered voters...this is NOT the Lincoln way!!!
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to