You still have to fill out the distribution agreement, and, yes, you are even still supposed to send them two copies of the end product.
Charlie Fiskeaux II Media Designer The Creative Group www.cre8tivegroup.com 859/858-9054x29 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Woodland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:14 PM Subject: Re: <lingo-l> ActiveX & Shockwave They used to require anyone who wanted to distribute QT with their multimedia product to download, sign, and mail them a licence agreement. I can't find it now. I think they've stopped using that ridiculous piece of paperwork. Only Microsoft has tried to steal code from QT. The rest of us just use it as it was intended. License agreements are an invention of lawyers so they can feel valued, not for rational people who actually do things for a living. As Jay Leno often says, "Of course, I'm way out of line here." ...I could even be wrong about the license thing (and lawyers in general). Ron Woodland Ross Clutterbuck wrote: >>The "install QT problem" is a myth. >> > > Doubly so if you just include the install files for QT basic on your > distribution CD (hell, even do a QT detect script and get it to install > automatically - the end user doesn't have to bother at all then). > > As an aside, anybody know what Apple's distribution agreement on QT is? I > can't find anything and I might be needing it soon. > > Ross [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!] [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
