> I immediatly liked _Design Patterns_, because of the emphasis
> on how objects
> collaborate. When I first encountered OOP, collaboration was
> the biggest of
> mysteries. The often sited benefit of OOP is code reuse, however it
is
> pretty hard to craft a object class that really is reusable.
> And it is very
> easy to write Object Oriented code that is as messy or messier than
> procedural stuff!
I just can't get "another" book right now. can you summarize a couple
of these patterns & how you can see it relating to Lingo? I am
interested.
Note that I have made this a little different thread.
Al Hospers
CamberSoft, Inc.
al<at>cambersoft<dot>com
http://www.cambersoft.com
Shockwave and Director development, Lingo programming, CGI scripting.
A famous linguist once said:
"There is no language wherein a double
positive can form a negative."
YEAH, RIGHT
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
