> As long as > RedHat persists in producing their non-standard kernels, they just need to > make sure that IBM sees them a little while before release to ensure that > their nasty OSA driver works with it--and they go to market together. You miss the point completely... If someone wants to make a kernel mod on their system AND run OSA... well, IBM has prevented them from doing this... when there is no good reason for this being the case... as it would have been possible to build the OSA driver in such a way as to have its OCO parts separate from the kernel's internals! Just bad design... which the customers suffer under. Period. Peace. -njg
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Vic Cross
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Alan Cox
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Rick Troth
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Gregg C Levine
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Nick Gimbrone
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Gregg C Levine
- Kernel versioning (was Re: LCS d... Vic Cross
- Re: Kernel versioning (was ... John Summerfield
- Re: Kernel versioning (... Rick Troth
- Re: Kernel versioning (... Rob van der Heij
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Nick Gimbrone
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Post, Mark K
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Causey, James F.
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Florian La Roche
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Dennis G. Wicks
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Post, Mark K
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Gregg C Levine
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Patterson, Ross
- Re: LCS drivers for 2.4.9 ? Post, Mark K