> > Do you happen to know what version of AFS you tested? Current releases > > (1.4.x and 1.5.x) no longer use rx event polling (the last version that > > used that methodology AFAIK was one of the 1.2 branches) in favor of > > wakeup-driven events via the kernel event mechanism. > > Whatever Sir Neale was running: openafs-1.4.4-1.2 from what I can see. > (but this is not as bad as a Java thread I found doing 20 ms timer ticks)
Thanks. I'll look into what's going on there; 1.4.4 shouldn't be enabling that code any longer with only a very few exceptions. Were there any connectivity problems that you know about? The only reference I can find to the rx_event stuff is in some of the read-only shadow code. 20 ms? Ugh. -- db ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
