On Tuesday, 06/14/2011 at 11:36 EDT, Sam Bass <sam.b...@mclaneco.com>
wrote:

> Do you think IBM will think about adding a 'page delete' feature so you
can
> migrate page volumes to another disk subsystem so you don't have to
shutdown
> all of the guest and z/VM?  It sure would be handy.
> I was hoping to move all of the paging to the new devices so I would
have less
> to do on the weekend when I move the z/VM res/spool/page/guest volumes.

Not unless folks begin to get louder in their requests for such a
function.  I can tell you than "handiness" is not a metric IBM uses to
decide such things.

Looking at the Single System Image environment, you would relocate the
(important) guests to another LPAR, re-IPL this LPAR, and then relocate
them back.  So I suppose you'd have to have a compelling argument as to
why SSI wouldn't be acceptable.

Same problem with spool, btw, though at least you can use SPOOLCHN and
SPXTAPE to fix it.

BTW, I have my own closet full of various T-shirts, and I have one labeled
"Had to re-IPL to reclaim DASD".  :-(

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to