> IMO, as long as the user has to maintain the DCSS it will never catch on.

Exactly. It's beneficial, but the lack of tooling and implementation 
integration makes it a PITA. We got plenty of those. 

> The software vendor must decide what should/shouldn't go into the DCSS,
> not the sysprog.  When you get a service update, the DCSS needs to be re-
> built automatically if the sysprog has configured its use.  And I want to
> configure its use in only one place.  I don't want to have to say 'yes'
> in File A, and then the name in File B, and for the system to load it in File 
> C.

Compare to the trigger-based initrd auto-regeneration in modern RHEL, or 
similar in Debian. 
That's how it *should* work. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to