Linux-Advocacy Digest #801, Volume #30 Sun, 10 Dec 00 23:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: windoze is awful ("Les Mikesell")
Re: Windows review (Curtis)
Re: Linux is awful ("Les Mikesell")
Re: Linux is awful ("Les Mikesell")
Re: windoze is awful (Kenny Pearce)
Re: Linux is awful ("Les Mikesell")
Linux is INFERIOR to Windows ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux is INFERIOR to Windows ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux is INFERIOR to Windows ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Caifornia power shortage... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Caifornia power shortage... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Caifornia power shortage... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Caifornia power shortage... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: windoze is awful
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:31:18 GMT
"Kelsey Bjarnason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:tg0Y5.10345$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> [snips]
>
> "Kenny Pearce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > software is irrelevant. As was previously mentioned, user side software
> CANNOT
> > cause linux to crash...
>
> So is configuring your soundcard considered "user side"?
No, device drivers run in the kernel, and probes to detect the
hardware are either kernel mode or given direct access to
the ports/memory which amounts to the same thing.
> I've had my
> machine lock *dead* - reset switch required - and had it do this
> *consistently* - just by trying to use Mandrake's tools for configuring
the
> sound card. 7.2 seems to have fixed this... or it could be the fact it's
> running on a different box... but 7.1 on the old box did it every single
> time, without fail.
ISApnp is an astoundingly bad idea. I wonder who invented and
promoted it. Maybe your other box is all PCI.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Windows review
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 21:34:20 -0500
"Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
| What do you do when you have large amounts of anything?
Use a CLI. :=)
If I only have a few files in the intended directory then the GUI is
just fine. Keeping oneself organised helps.
| For your
| example starting Windows Explorer, I have to scroll down through
| a page and a half of programs before I get to it. Likewise, the
| directories
| and files I want are often out of sight and take extra work to bring into
| view.
I only come up on that problem when looking through the system folders.
At that stage I use either the CLI or the search utility to display the
files I need to see.
| Is there an equivalent to a shortcut key to get to a particular
| program on the program menu?
Yes, creating shortcuts to commonly used programs on either the desktop,
the start menu or the quicklaunch bar? It avoids having to wade through
the programs menu.
--
Curtis
| ,__o
!___ _-\_<, An egotist thinks he's in the groove
<(*)>--(*)/'(*)______________________ when he's in a rut.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ROT13 scrambled)
------------------------------
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux is awful
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:38:34 GMT
"Pete Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:910vmc$j4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <cyZX5.40826$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In other words, they sold you a filesystem that wasn't suitable for
> > storing data, and rather than fix it, they invented a new and different
> > way to store their own data.
>
> They sold an inefficient filing system that didn't take into account the
> size of disk driver that would become available.
>
> > The other disadvantage: none of your usual tools can manipulate it. Of
> > course windows users aren't used to having decent tools for automation
> > anyway so most don't understand the loss - at least until they have to
> > pay for some special package to do it.
>
> They did provide regedit. So, the fact that you can't edit it with a
> text editor, but you can _edit_ it, how is that a problem (apart from
> the inability to store comments)?
If you have a dozen machines, how can you tell what is different about
each? With a directory of text files and the unix 'diff' tool it is no
problem. NFS mount a 'standard' machine and one command will
do it. With the registry you are stuck. Also, the text files allow
comments so once you know what lines are different you can
usually see why by looking at them in the context of the file.
With the registry you might find a value or two that is documented
if you search hard enough.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: Linux is awful
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:43:39 GMT
"Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> |
> | I agree with you on this, but the root cause is a _poor_ design of the
> | OS. Or actually, from what I know of windows, no design of the OS,
> | just add whatever to it (like ie). The fact that a critical system
> | file, like the registry, or dll's can be overwritten by installing an
> | application is just unbelievable. No wonder windows systems are so
> | fragile.
>
> I agree that this is a problem which affected NT as well, though bad
> registry entries are added by apps; I don't know of the registry being
> overwritten by apps. However, Win2k comes with system file protection
> that prevents apps from overwriting these dlls winny-nilly. Just the
> other day I was trying a piece of software and got the message from
> Win2k that the installation was trying to replace a system dll and that
> this would be prevented. Of course the application malfunctioned, but
> who cares ... good riddance.
Does that mean you can no longer download an update to IE (something
that typically replaces a bunch of system dlls), or does MS only
block competitors apps from installing?
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Kenny Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: windoze is awful
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:42:53 -0800
I appologize. I had netscape completely lock up my system and I couldn't get it
to switch virtual terminals (ctrl + alt + Fx had no effect) or restart my x
server (ctrl + alt + backspace). However, this is, as was mentioned, due to the
x-server having root privileges on some level, in that Netscape's interaction
with the X-server is what caused it to crash, rather than netscape, which has
limited privileges, being able to crash the system while interacting directly
with the kernel.
Kenny Pearce wrote:
> software is irrelevant. As was previously mentioned, user side software CANNOT
> cause linux to crash... the program itself may crash (I must admit, I have had
> my X-server crash once. I came to the conclusion it was literally an act of
> God (and that's not a figure of speech)), but the kernel itself cannot crash
> due to the actions of user side software. You simply can't say that of
> Windoze.
> Ayende Rahien wrote:
>
> > "Adam Majer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Ayende Rahien wrote:
> > > >
> > > > NT & installing hardware go along quite easily with words like
> > "hellspawn"
> > > > and "WTF!!!"
> > > > Try 2000, if it offered nothing else to top NT, it would still be worth
> > > > going to it *just* for this reason alone.
> > >
> > >
> > > Just to add to windoze bashing ,win2k proff. is suppose to be the _MOST_
> > > stable windoze ever released by M$. Well, :) it crashes about every
> > > 30min when running unstable software. I never thought that an OS should
> > > be affected by the user software that it runs - Linux _never_ dies on me
> > > like that [running 3 yrs now and zero crashes :-]
> >
> > A> Win 2K Pro. is certainly not supposed to be the most stable windows ever
> > released by MS. For this, look at Win2K DataCenter.
> > B> Did you checked with support? Do you've correct, WQL, drivers? What
> > software do you run?
------------------------------
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux is awful
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 02:47:38 GMT
"Kelsey Bjarnason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:%01Y5.10365$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > If so, UDMA 100 controllers are backwards compatible
> > to 66/33 UDMA.
>
> They're not; to fall back, you have to physically swap the cables around.
>
> > Linux, currently supports UDMA up to 66 (can still use
> > an UDMA 100 controller, however, it is not optimised for it), however,
> > it is an urban myth that UDMA 100 gives better HDD performance than UDMA
> > 66/33 as the speed depends on factors outside the specs of the
> > controller, such as the rotation speed of the disk, the size of the
> > buffer, internal transfer rate and the speed of the CPU (as IDE
> > controllers are very CPU hungry, hence, the reason why most power users
> > prefer SCSI).
>
> 7200RPM, 2Mb onboard cache, on a 1Ghz box...
>
> As to SCSI, to get a comparable configuration to what I have with IDE, I'd
> have to spend about $1,000 per drive, not counting the controller. As it
> is, I got both my IDE drives for less than the cost of _one_ comparable
SCSI
> drive. If I had an unlimited pocketbook, I'd probably go SCSI. As it is,
a
> decently set up IDE system gives me sufficient disk speed for my purposes;
> my stuff is mostly CPU bound as a rule. I just think it's ridiculous to
> have to cripple the drives to get Linux working.
Which IDE drive are you using that can transfer data faster than a
66Mhz controller can handle? If they really are half the price
of SCSI, I'd like to get some.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: no.alt.arkiv,tw.bbs.comp.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Linux is INFERIOR to Windows
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 03:03:41 GMT
Hello to all!
The result is out. Linux is INFERIOR to Windows. :-)
Ah, I know you Linux people are bursting with rage right now. Sarcasms
and insults are evitable for me, I know.
Please read this test by Mindcraft that compares Linux and Windows NT.
After reading this, you will agree with me.
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/openbench1.html
Ha! Ha!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: no.alt.arkiv,tw.bbs.comp.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Linux is INFERIOR to Windows
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 03:03:22 GMT
Hello to all!
The result is out. Linux is INFERIOR to Windows. :-)
Ah, I know you Linux people are bursting with rage right now. Sarcasms
and insults are evitable for me, I know.
Please read this test by Mindcraft that compares Linux and Windows NT.
After reading this, you will agree with me.
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/openbench1.html
Ha! Ha!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: no.alt.arkiv,tw.bbs.comp.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Linux is INFERIOR to Windows
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 03:03:32 GMT
Hello to all!
The result is out. Linux is INFERIOR to Windows. :-)
Ah, I know you Linux people are bursting with rage right now. Sarcasms
and insults are evitable for me, I know.
Please read this test by Mindcraft that compares Linux and Windows NT.
After reading this, you will agree with me.
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/openbench1.html
Ha! Ha!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black)
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:12:43 -0500
Charlie Ebert wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 09:41:30 GMT, kiwiunixman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Windows 2000 Pro, has had slow sales, not because of any technical
> >limitations, but because most consumers are waiting for the arrival of
> >Windows Whistler that will address the short commings of Windows ME and
> >Windows 2000 Pro. I donot see in the short term, a rocket "growth" for
> >Linux in the consumer market, however, I could see it in the Server (low
> >end market) in the immediate future.
> >
> >kiwiunixman
> >
> >Chad Myers wrote:
> >
>
> Ahh, Linux is kicking Microsofts ass out of every continent and country
> with the exeption is the U.S.A and Canada as we speak.
And in the US, it's kind of like Washington's fight against the British...
years of defeats, culminating in total victory.
>
> Those are the facts.
>
> Charlie
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Caifornia power shortage...
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:17:37 -0500
Homer Simpson wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Actually, the REAL problem is that the ECO-NUTS in California shut
> > > > down practically every fission power project that came down the pike
> > > > in the 1970's.
> > > >
> > > > If those plants had been built, a lot of oil-fired and coal-fired
> > > > plants would have been taken off-line a long time ago AND Cali.
> > > > would STILL have surplus capacity.
> >
> > Leftwing Liberal paranoid eco-freak's worst nightmare...
> >
> > Public DEMANDS for nuclear power plants.
> >
> >
> > Of course, this is exactly the situation which the radical left
> > was hoping for....a general degradation of life in the US...it's
> > part of their overall strategy of trying to cause internal collapse
> > within the United States so that a power-vacuum will occur, allowing
> > them to sweep into power and install a Communist state.
>
> Replies trimmed to comp.os.linux.advocacy, where Aaron R. Kulkis
> often visits:
>
> You know Aaron, it is just this sort of attitude that worsens the
> problem. To label everyone that opposes nuclear power in California
> as "ECO-NUTS" is pretty irresponsible. There may be, and in fact are,
> some very practical reasons for not building nuclear facilities in
> California - earthquakes. A large part of the state is underlain with
> an extensive and highly active fault system. I have friends in and from
> the San Luis Obispo area that are definitely NOT in the "ECO-NUT"
> category that opposed and are still positively mortified that ANYONE
> could conceive of, let alone build a nuclear power reactor in an area
> such as Diablo. It's not NIMBY. It's just some very intelligent folks
> that feel strongly that the risks far outweigh the benefits.
You moron. Ceramic uranium reactor pellets are safe to handle.
>
> Stephen
> (please note unspam address - [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Caifornia power shortage...
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:18:20 -0500
joseph wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> JFW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
> >> Nice rant, but take a look at the how, why and effects of utility
> >> deregulation. It's the important 85-90 percent of the problem; the real
> >> culprit, e.g., everyone knew 10 years ago that utilities were not going to
> >> build the needed plants or upgrade existing ones because there was no
> >> provision in the law for them to recover the costs under de-regulation.
> >
> >You are an idiot.
> >
> >Under de-regulation, you can charge whatever price you need to
> >cover your costs...as long as their is a competing company in the
> >same area (which is going to be faced with the same costs themselves).
>
> Why the same costs?
>
> The purpose of deregulation is to take advatage of LOWER cost producers so we
> expect not all producers to have the same costs. We in CA may use electricity
> generated in Washington and the WA power plant would be paid much more per KW
> than they would get locally. This market may increase prices in the western US
> but that will only encourage more investment.
Regardless...the costs of building additional capacity are basically
the same to ALL providers in a region.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Caifornia power shortage...
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:19:36 -0500
joseph wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >Russ Lyttle wrote:
> >>
> >> Mike Marion wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> >> >What's going to happen in a year, or two when our population grows by
> >> > that much more?
> >> California is going to try to steal power from the other states. If AL
> >> Gore is president and pushes the California Liberal Agenda, there is a
> >> good chance that there will be enough anger in the other states to cut
> >> the feeds to California.
> >>
> >
> >Don't worry...if the power companies' management doesn't do it...
> >the people will.
>
> I wonder how and why.
>
> Selling a resource to the higherst bidder is a Republican value. There's no
> way a Republican or Libertarian would interfere and stop companies from selling
> power to CA customers. If "Al Gore" and the left agree then there is no
> opposition. No power will be cut. No shareholder would dream of turning down
> profit from selling to a "liberal" state.
California will attempt to ram through some federal-level legislation
forcing other states to sell electricity to them at below-market rates.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Caifornia power shortage...
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 22:20:46 -0500
joseph wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
>
> >> Sorry but it was the utilities that canceled every single Nuke plant after
> >> Three Mile Island. The effect of the regulators was not the prime cause. The
> >
> >Court costs, idiot...The radical eco-communist strategy was to shut down
> >all nuclear power plant projects by driving the legal costs sky high
> >by tangling up each and every plant in a sea of legal costs.
>
> The power industry blames price regulation. The cap on prices reduces the
> incentive to invest in more plants of ANY kind.
They had this SAME regulation in the 50's and 60's... the ONLY thing
that has changed since then is the endless parade of bullshit
lawsuits whenever a fission-powered plant is proposed.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
