Linux-Advocacy Digest #853, Volume #30 Wed, 13 Dec 00 16:13:04 EST
Contents:
Re: Whistler review. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Sun Microsystems and the end of Open Source ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Whistler review. (Josiah Fizer)
Re: OS and Product Alternative Names - Idiocy in action ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Server licensing Cost: Linux vs. NT ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Caifornia power shortage... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Predicting the Future ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Caifornia power shortage... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Uptimes ("Erik Funkenbusch")
Re: Caifornia power shortage... ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Whistler review.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:45:08 -0500
Charlie Ebert wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:37:58 GMT,
> Chad C. Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >"Charlie Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:14:07 GMT,
> >> Chad C. Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Charlie Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> >> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:00:50 -0500,
> >> >> Gary Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >Ayende Rahien wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Do check again, anyone with root privileges and not enough knowledge
> >> >can
> >> >> >> crush a *nix, or any other OS, for that matter.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Going willy-nilly in root is a far cry from Win2K hosing itself when
> >you
> >> >> >install a wrong application.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >"747's are reliable, so long as you don't take off the wings" and
> >> >> >"windows is reliable so long as you don't install 'bad' applications
> >and
> >> >> >'know' what you are doing" are NOT equivant statements. (and if
> >> >> >something does go wrong it is obviously YOUR FAULT) Read my ORIGIONAL
> >> >> >post in this light and it point should be more clear.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> <snipage>
> >> >>
> >> >> This is typical of the Windows mentality.
> >> >>
> >> >> The definition of an operating system includes the ability
> >> >> to adequately recover from application failure. In short,
> >> >> this means you shouldn't be able to write a program bad
> >> >> enough to make an operating system go down. Thus, Windows
> >> >> is not an operating system.
> >> >>
> >> >> It has no recovery, no protection, it's purely a large
> >> >> application in itself.
> >> >>
> >> >> Charlie
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >I would agree with you when referring to Win9x/ME, however when you enter
> >> >the NT/2000 family the game changes significantly. BTW, eunuchs are just
> >as
> >> >susceptible to bad programming as windows and a programmer running as
> >root
> >> >or some other privileged user can just as easily bring the system to it's
> >> >knees with a runaway process, some idiot fills swap completely and you
> >are
> >> >toast.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Windows has no user accounting system. Linux and the *nix does.
> >>
> >
> >Windows 9x and ME have no user accounting system.
> >
> >Windows NT and Windows 2000 do.
> >
>
> Interesting. What do you open on NT to perform user accounting with?
> For that matter, Windows 2000?
>
> Say I had a 60 GB drive and I wanted user harry to have up to 10 GB of
> it. I also wanted harry to have a nice cap of 5 clicks below the rest
> of the system so he wouldn't hog it all away from the rest of us.
> Oh, and harry will be in a special group which I'm going to create
> which only has use of 20 programs from the system.
>
> Windows doesn't have this capability. They never have and they
> never will. They are slowly going the UNIX way, but they don't
> have this capability yet.
.....being dragged, kicking and screaming....all the way...
>
> Charlie
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Sun Microsystems and the end of Open Source
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:46:38 -0500
Charlie Ebert wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:13:58 -0500,
> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Chad C. Mulligan" wrote:
> >>
> >> Open source is dying. It is being hijacked by the Corporate big wigs. Sun,
> >> Corel, Redhat and IBM are doing everyone a favor by destroying the anarchy
> >> that is open source software. I just started a download of StarOffice 5.2.
> >> (no new development since its appropriation by Sun over a year ago) and had
> >> to submit a lengthy registration document and license agreement with Sun.
> >> Free software indeed. Now I have an additional, largely useless, office
> >> application, but I'll be bombarded by advertising from Sun. I'd rather pay
> >> and not have these intrusions into my life.
> >
> >Star Office is NOT open source, you idiot.
> >
>
> Humm. Star Office is GPL'ed.
> The times they are a changin.
When did that happen?
>
> Charlie
>
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:48:24 -0800
From: Josiah Fizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Whistler review.
JM wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:36:40 +0200, in comp.os.linux.advocacy,
> ("Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> >> >> It has no recovery, no protection, it's purely a large
> >> >> application in itself.
>
> >> >I still have to run into an application that will crush Win2K.
>
> >> A low intensity 2D game using a mature version of DX will do.
>
> >Can you name one available for download?
>
> YES! You can get it from www.josephmrozek.net
heh heh. I can see it now. It industry up in arms cause NT cant run
erotic tetris. In all fairness I'll give it a try and see what it does
to an NT box.
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OS and Product Alternative Names - Idiocy in action
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:51:19 -0500
mitch wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:09:56 -0500, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >But LACK Of multithreading and virtual memory DEFINITELY hinder
> >the capabilities of any programmer and what tasks can be accomplished,
> >and how much effort and complication is needed to get sophisticated
> >tasks to work properly....leading to more bugs...
> >
> >Or are you now going to try to tell us that you can run multi-threaded
> >applications on an OS that doesn't support multithreading...
> >
>
> No - but it the application is one that I use and am happy and
> productive with, should I care if the OS supports multithreading? No.
And this benefits the other users who need multithreading support how?
Your argument is that a VW bug is just as good a vehicle as Humvee
because *you* never do off-road driving.
The point is about the TOTAL capabilities of the product...whether
*you* choose to use those capabilities or not is irrelevant.
>
> >
> >nevertheless, your lack of understanding that capabilities MUST precede
> >performance puts you at the bottom of the heap.
>
> I understand your statement completely - I just don`t agree with it
> completely.
>
> If you wanted to pull chicks, would you drive a skoda chassis with a
> ferrari engine? No. Would you drive a ferrari chassis with a skoda
> engine? Yes.
False analogy.
> Nobody would argue that the car with the ferrari engine
> is the best car, but if it doesn`t meet the requirements of the
> driver, then what use is it?
>
> --
> Smileys are nothing but conceptual wheelchair ramps for the humor impaired.
> - Geoff Miller
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Server licensing Cost: Linux vs. NT
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:56:13 -0600
"Charlie Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> To make the statement that more than say 1% of the Windows
> user base is developing in compilers like GCC is crazy.
If there wasn't a demand for them, they wouldn't exist.
I can't back it up, but i'd be willing to bet that there are more physical
numbers of developers using GCC on Win32 than there are on all other
platforms combined. While that number may be a small percentage of the
total Win32 developers, it's still a big number.
> The problem with the COST of using Windows is VB, VC,
> or some Borland product which increases their cost.
Explain that claim.
> I'm just saying the VAST majority of Windows users
> are developing in VB. And this is WHY the cost
> of using Windows for your business is crazy.
Why?
> And if your inclined to LIKE GCC then why aren't
> you using Linux in the first place as your OS.
Because Windows is a required platform?
> Linux is a more stable, better OS platform than
> Windows could ever be. And Linux is certaintly
> cheaper. It's also much more capable and pliable
> than Windows. With Windows you have no embedded
> opportunities.
That's completely untrue. Windows CE and Embedded NT are already quite
popular and are being used extensively.
> But YES, you can use GCC on Windows. The vast
> majority don't. And then there is the question,
> WHY on windows?
Because it's a good, free compiler. Same reason you use it on Linux instead
of, say, CodeWarrior for Linux.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Caifornia power shortage...
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:53:27 -0500
Craig Gullixson wrote:
>
> Chad Myers wrote:
>
> > As much as great nuclear facilities are, the nuclear waste problem in
> > the U.S. alone is staggering. Coal power plants are becoming cleaner
> > every year and producing more power. We should build a few more around
> > the country to hold us off until the Tokomak comes online in 5-10
> > years and provides the entire world with enough electricity for decades.
>
> Ah, the fusion thing. It has been expected that cheep fusion power will
> be available in a 10 to 20 year timeframe since at least the late '50s.
> Also, there are waste issues with fusion. I'm not saying that fusion power
> would be a bad thing, but there are serious problems with both putting
> together a useful power plant and with the plant becoming radioactive ...
>
Never mind the fact that, apart from the weapons industry, nobody has
EVER been able to set up a sustained fusion reaction.
> >Trust me, I'm no environmentalist or tree hugger, but I'm practical.
> > Plutonium 239 has a half-life of 24,000 years or so. The only practical
> > disposal is into outer space or embedded deep in geologically stable
> > shelf rock far below underground water run off systems in a remote
> > part of the desert.
>
> Or you could recycle it and use it to generate power ....
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
> Craig A. Gullixson
> Senior Research Associate INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> National Solar Observatory/Sac. Peak PHONE: (505) 434-7065
> Sunspot, NM 88349 USA FAX: (505) 434-7029
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Predicting the Future
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:52:03 GMT
In article <jfOZ5.25138$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering we already have at least four distributions who have
reached
> the "Version 7.0" range (Mandrake 7.2, Red Hat 7.0, Suse 7.0,
Slackware
> 7.1), I predict that in about four to five years, we'll see the
following
> headlines:
>
> "Linux Mandrake Version 34.2 Released!"
> "Red Hat 29.0 Now Shipping"
> "LinuxWorld Takes a First Looks at SuSE 31.4"
>
> "Debian 2.6.0 now available"
>
> ;-)
>
> Bracy
>
Darn right! I propose the following...
Linux 2000
Linux/ME
Linux.NET
That way they can start over at version 1.0 and nobody will suspect a
thing.
<grin>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Caifornia power shortage...
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:00:34 -0500
Ian Davey wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >Per mile driven, Electric cars take MORE energy to run, due to
> >transmission losses between the power company and the car, and
> >in charging up the batteries.
>
> Who said you need a power company to charge the batteries? Use a solar panel
> and you get open source energy right from the sun :-)
Do you have any fucking idea of how much energy it takes to produce
a photo-voltaic cell?
> Why rely on big
> companies to provide your energy? That's like relying on Microsoft to supply
> your operating systems.
You are an idiot. With solar panels, you pay a HUGE energy cost
up front (remember, the first step of making a solar cell is MELTING SAND!),
which may or may not be recouped (depending on how soon it is before the
pitifully fragile thing is broken.).
At best, solar panels can function as trickle-chargers for automobiles
in long-term storage. The ratio of CHARGING MONTHS / DRIVING MINUTES
for a vehicle-sized solar panel is not merely prohibitive, but makes
your idea idiotically ludicrous.
[Hint, this concept worked for the moon landing only for a couple of
reasons:
1) The lunar rover is a VERY light vehicle ( couple hundred pounds)
as it had no need for 5-mph bumpers, or other safety features.
2) The current generated by any photovoltaic cell on the moon is
orders of magnitude greater than here on earth, due to the lack
of an atmosphere around the moon.
>
> ian.
>
> \ /
> (@_@) http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
> /(&)\ http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
> | |
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Red hat becoming illegal?
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:01:34 -0500
Ilja Booij wrote:
>
> Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> > >
> > > Jeffersonian liberalism is about freeing the individual.
> > >
> > > Modern (left-wing) "liberalism" is all about enslavement.
> > >
> > > Thus, their very self-designated monicker IS Newspeak.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Man, you are one crazy cat!
> >
> > And that last clause goes for you, too.
> >
> > I think I'll just call myself a freethinker. Too many
> > people have projected their own delusions onto the
> > word "liberal".
> >
> > Chris
>
> May I just add that in my country, the liberals are right-wingers
> (conservative, moneyspeaking types, hmm, sounds somewhat bad, but
> let's say mostly more conservative)
> isn't what you guys call liberalism something more towards socialism?
Yes...the term liberal (root: liber = freedom) has been absconded
with by the freedom-hating socialists.
>
> Ilja
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Uptimes
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:10:23 -0600
"sfcybear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:9171ke$rhj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Number one, I had no intention of wasting my time looking for the proof
> for the likes of what I find in this group.
You'd rather waste your time spouting useless conjecture and claim it's
fact.
YOU of all people cannot make the claim of "not wasting my time" since
that's all you do here is waste your and others time.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Caifornia power shortage...
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:07:19 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Aaron R. Kulkis writes:
>
> >> Russ Lyttle writes:
>
> >>> All this from an simple intuitive power cord.
>
> >> Incorrect; Aaron's claim that nothing about a computer is intuitive
> >> preceded that.
>
> > Which has been amply demonstrated in this thread.
>
> On the contrary, nobody else has amply demonstrated the sequence of
> claims in this thread.
>
> > Tholen...
> > when you finally realize how utterly worthless your life is...
> > remember to slit lengthwise.
>
> Once again, lacking a logical argument, you turn to invective. No
> surprise there.
>
> Kulkis, once you finally realize how insecure you are, maybe you'll
> come back here an apologize some day.
Tholen...
when you finally realize how utterly worthless your life is...
remember to slit lengthwise.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
