Am Sat, 19 Jul 2014 22:10:51 +0200 schrieb Marc Joliet <mar...@gmx.de>:
[...] > Another random idea: the number of errors decreased the second time I ran > balance (from 4 to 2), I could run another full balance and see if it keeps > decreasing. Well, this time there were still 2 ENOSPC errors. But I can show the df output after such an ENOSPC error, to illustrate what I meant with the sudden surge in total usage: # btrfs filesystem df /run/media/marcec/MARCEC_BACKUP Data, single: total=236.00GiB, used=229.04GiB System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=36.00KiB Metadata, DUP: total=4.00GiB, used=3.20GiB unknown, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00 And then after running a balance and (almost) immediately cancelling: # btrfs filesystem df /run/media/marcec/MARCEC_BACKUP Data, single: total=230.00GiB, used=229.04GiB System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=36.00KiB Metadata, DUP: total=4.00GiB, used=3.20GiB unknown, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00 -- Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
