Hi,

Just to let you know that I renamed fence-timeout to
stonith-timeout, because there are already stonith-this and
stonith-that in crm_cluster_properties. Still better to be
consistently "stonith": naming this "fence-..." would most
probably confuse people. As if they weren't confused enough ;-)

Thanks,

Dejan

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Satomi-san,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 05:39:53PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > I found some bugs.
> >
> > 1) When fence-timeout is not set and priority is set,
> >    priority's value is used as both fence_timeout and priority.
> >    The patch for this bug is fence-timeout.patch
> 
> Right. An oversight while pondering whether to have it in a loop
> or wait and see if there'll be more stonithd attributes coming :)
> 
> > 2) Stonithd can execute only 2 or less plugins.
> >    With 3 or more plugins, priority is ignored.
> >    The patch for this is stonith_rsc_priorities.patch
> 
> Oh, that code was tricky. Strange that it fails on more than two
> plugins.
> 
> > I hope they are helpful to you.
> 
> Of course. Thanks for the patches and testing!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dejan
> 
> 
> > Best Regards,
> > Satomi TANIGUCHI
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to