Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:24, Satomi TANIGUCHI
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Thank you for letting me know!
I'll test it.
Now, may I ask you a question?
cluster-delay seems to still require the value
which is longer than the maximum possible stonith timeout for tengine.
Is this with pacemaker 0.7?
If so, can you open a bug for this please?
It's with Pacemaker-Devel(2905fa0cdda7).
I reported this to Bugzilla.
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975
Please let me know if you want other logs, confs, or information.
Best Regards,
Satomi TANIGUCHI
The CRM should be waiting forever.
If cluster-delay is shorter than sum total of plugins' timeout values,
then tengine detect a STONITH op timed out
and new STONITH op is executed.
Then two or more plugins are executed in parallel.
Will it change in future?
(We are just in a transition period?)
Or did it lose possibility because of my insistence that
"the way to add fence(stonith)-timeuot is better"?
I'm afraid that because Andrew said that
the cluster can just forever for stonithd to return
if stonithd no longer needs a timeout value from crmd...
Regards,
Satomi TANIGUCHI
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
Just to let you know that I renamed fence-timeout to
stonith-timeout, because there are already stonith-this and
stonith-that in crm_cluster_properties. Still better to be
consistently "stonith": naming this "fence-..." would most
probably confuse people. As if they weren't confused enough ;-)
Thanks,
Dejan
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Satomi-san,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 05:39:53PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote:
Hi Dejan,
I found some bugs.
1) When fence-timeout is not set and priority is set,
priority's value is used as both fence_timeout and priority.
The patch for this bug is fence-timeout.patch
Right. An oversight while pondering whether to have it in a loop
or wait and see if there'll be more stonithd attributes coming :)
2) Stonithd can execute only 2 or less plugins.
With 3 or more plugins, priority is ignored.
The patch for this is stonith_rsc_priorities.patch
Oh, that code was tricky. Strange that it fails on more than two
plugins.
I hope they are helpful to you.
Of course. Thanks for the patches and testing!
Cheers,
Dejan
Best Regards,
Satomi TANIGUCHI
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
