Hi Satomi-san, On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:24:39PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > > Thank you for letting me know! > I'll test it. > > Now, may I ask you a question? > cluster-delay seems to still require the value > which is longer than the maximum possible stonith timeout for tengine. > If cluster-delay is shorter than sum total of plugins' timeout values, > then tengine detect a STONITH op timed out > and new STONITH op is executed.
You mean that the transition is aborted, right? > Then two or more plugins are executed in parallel. Oops, that doesn't work as supposed. Andrew introduced a cluster property "stonith-timeout", I guess that that can be tweaked now. How/if that influences the cluster-delay... Andrew should know. > Will it change in future? > (We are just in a transition period?) > Or did it lose possibility because of my insistence that > "the way to add fence(stonith)-timeuot is better"? > I'm afraid that because Andrew said that > the cluster can just forever for stonithd to return > if stonithd no longer needs a timeout value from crmd... The cluster-delay still governs, if I'm not wrong, the cluster transition timeout. If the resources are not able to do the transition within this period, then the transition's aborted. Don't know what's the plan B after that. Thanks, Dejan > > Regards, > Satomi TANIGUCHI > > > > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just to let you know that I renamed fence-timeout to >> stonith-timeout, because there are already stonith-this and >> stonith-that in crm_cluster_properties. Still better to be >> consistently "stonith": naming this "fence-..." would most >> probably confuse people. As if they weren't confused enough ;-) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dejan >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:00:53AM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >>> Hi Satomi-san, >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 05:39:53PM +0900, Satomi TANIGUCHI wrote: >>>> Hi Dejan, >>>> >>>> I found some bugs. >>>> >>>> 1) When fence-timeout is not set and priority is set, >>>> priority's value is used as both fence_timeout and priority. >>>> The patch for this bug is fence-timeout.patch >>> Right. An oversight while pondering whether to have it in a loop >>> or wait and see if there'll be more stonithd attributes coming :) >>> >>>> 2) Stonithd can execute only 2 or less plugins. >>>> With 3 or more plugins, priority is ignored. >>>> The patch for this is stonith_rsc_priorities.patch >>> Oh, that code was tricky. Strange that it fails on more than two >>> plugins. >>> >>>> I hope they are helpful to you. >>> Of course. Thanks for the patches and testing! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dejan >>> >>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Satomi TANIGUCHI >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev >>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ >> _______________________________________________________ >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
