On 2012-09-12T09:01:05, Alan Robertson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The status from these agents may feed into operations on other
> > resources that are fully managed.
>
> Understood.
>
> I believe it will care about those other agents - not these. It
> shouldn't know about these, AFAIK.
I guess then you're talking about a different effort from what
Dejan, Yan, and I are investigating. (Since we need that status so that
Pacemaker can restart the VM, if needed, for example.)
(Our goal is also to reuse existing probes from other monitoring
frameworks, not rewrite them.)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
