Last I used PAE kernels (ages ago) - I saw 1-5% degradation in performance. It was a while ago and I am not even sure I remember the versions any more.
What I remember is NOT scientific data. M ----- "Muli Ben-Yehuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to understand this better, if you or Marc could shed > more > details? In general, I believe you know what they say about "lies, > damn lies, and performance numbers". See some numbers from Ingo > Molnar > which give the PAE overhead at a round 0.0% here: > http://kerneltrap.org/node/2891. YMMV. > > 100Hz 100.00% > 100Hz + PAE: 0.00% > > 1000Hz: -1.08% > 1000Hz + PAE: -1.08% > > Cheers, > Muli > > ================================================================= > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ---MAV Marc A. Volovic Swiftouch, LTD [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-544-676764 ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
