Hi Sara,
I wonder if you aren't better off just getting an ADSL line and switching service providers.

 - yba


On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, sara fink wrote:

Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:14:51 +0300
From: sara fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ILUG <linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: major packet loss at hot server

I don't have a machine that runs tcpdump. Plus it needs root access.
I wonder if I create one of these free shells that are out there, will
it help? tcpdump will work without root as well?

Last time I talked with 012 and hot, hot managed to dissconnect me
completely. The support from hot was nice, but told me to unplug the
cable and replug again. And from then I don't have internet at all.
The /etc/resolv.conf is correct.  I waited for hot to call me back,
but it didn't happen. Since now I am not at home, I can't check
anything. When I will return back will have to shout at them to
connect me to internet.

All the time when I ran mtr google.com  (outside) there was the packet
loss. The loss is in the 2nd and 3rd hop. first is the router of hot (
I have another router at home but last time I didn't use it for the
purpose of checking and proving hot it's not my router fault), then
the switch with 80% packet loss and 3rd another switch/router of hot
with 20% packet loss. 2nd hop is bgp. port 179 open. 3rd switch/router
has port 49 open (tacacs).  AND from my scannings, I pass only through
1 switch which has bgp open.

I have access to a machine, but not as root. I can run there
traceroute. And will definitely run from there mtr to machine A and
traceroute from there to my machine.  Are there any others programs
that I can run as simple user?

I can't understand them, if I pass through such a switch, where they
close all the ports and allow only 179, 646, and all udp ports are
closed what kind of internet is that. It castrates all the concept of
internet.


BTW, I want to ask a legal question. I will finally submit a complaint
through tluna.co.il, but I don't know if it's legal to submit the ip
numbers.  A lot of people are using these switches, and people don't
know about this problem.

Thanks in advance for all the help.


 Hi Sara,
 If you have access to a machine somewhere that runs tcpdump, then use hping
commands from your MPLS to that machine in order to see if the packet loss
is occuring on the outgoing or on the return trip. That is, hping out 50
packets. Check to see how many of those get to the target and then check to
see how many of those that got to the target got back to you. If there is a
more packet loss on the return leg than on the outgoing leg I would suspect
a routing problem. If there is more loss on the early hops of the outgoing
leg then I suspect either congestion or physical transmission problems with
the final repeater or router.



How do I use different routing? Any idea of  which ips should I put?


 You can't if you dont have a static IP. Well, I guess that you could check
the routing to your first hop out that has a routed IP address by using
various foreign traceroute web pages. If the routing problem is low enough
and there is only one BGP router through which your packets can pass, then
you might not be able to see the routing problem. I was able to see the
routing problem that I had at Netvision last week because I was able to
access my line from different Netvision border routers because Netvision is
pretty big. It was really clear that one particular border router was
getting bad information from an internal router.


I know someone who is very nice at 012. She belongs to service dep,
and she promissed to send someone who knows well unix/linux. I will
see what I can do today. Otherwise, www.tluna.co.il is the answer. I
put  last year a complaint there and they started to call me (not vice
versa). The problem was solved.

There is another weird thing which I don't understand: the ip
213.57.43.199 shows
IP address:                     213.57.43.199
Reverse DNS:                    [Timeout]
Reverse DNS authenticity:       [Unknown]
ASN:                            8584
ASN Name:                       UNSPECIFIED (Barak AS)

I don't belong to barak. Someone at 012 told me they have agreements
and they use each router on the way.


 Most suppliers have agreements for routing between them instead or or as
well as routing through the IIX. In addition many suppliers purchase
overseas bandwidth from BBL or Barak/Netvision. You can probably ask Hot if
they use Barak/Netvision.

  - yba




http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ipall.ch?domain=213.57.43.199

If someone can explain this, I will be glad.


On 3/29/08, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Sara,
Sounds like you should consider switching suppliers.

Regarding my problem with Netvision reported last week, I was able to
show
Netvision the difference in results (5% loss vs 70% loss) when using
different routes through Netvisions AS, mainly depending on where the
connection originated but this did not actually prove that there was a
routing error AFAIK. For some reason I didn't think to test if the
packet
loss was symmetric (outgoing as well as incomming). That would
probably have been as close as you could get to a proof of routing
error.

Does your packet loss depend on where you enter 012 from (i.e. from
Med1,
from the IIX, from 012 ADSL)? Is the packet loss symmetric? That is do
you
lose the same percent of packets on packet going out as comming in?

From my experience with Netvision, the level of service that you get at
the ISP depends on who knows you, or who knows someone who knows you.
Shavua Tov,

- yba


On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, sara fink wrote:


Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:43:37 +0300
From: sara fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
Subject: Re: major packet loss at hot server

I haven't solved the problem yet. From 012 someone "superior" (network
dep) are supposed to call me and they will put hot on conference and
this time I intend to request the net admin/integrator to take care of
that AND ask them to go directly to the switch and disable the
firewall.The ip from where there is 75-80% packet lost is a principal
switchand another 1 or 2 ips where I get additional ~15-20% packet
lost. They have a harsh firewall on the main switch. ALL UDP ports
are blocked. TCP also a lot of ports closed.

tcptraceroute (as opposed to traceroute manages to bypass firewall)
reveals that there is a firewall, although inside hot (between
switches) the ports are open (firewalk). As for the problem you had
last week, I am not sure, because I have static IP without dialer
(MPLS) and the first 2 hops belong to hot (where the packet loss
occurs) and the 3rd hop is 012. One of support guys said that is 012
blame because they are only infrastructure. 012 says it's hot ip and
they are right. And I am the ball which is ping-ponged. ;-(

AND ttl to my default gateway is 255. ttl for google.com is 225.

But, I will try wireshark as well to check syn, syn-ack. I don't use 3
way handshake. Otherwise I will be detected. I use nmap -sS. I
understand that you used -sT flag. Correct?

They make troubles if you scan their net? -sT for instance?

If you can tell me what exactly you ran, I will be glad.

On 3/28/08, Jonathan Ben Avraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Sara,
Did you solve this problem?
Are you sure that it isn't a routing problem at 012 similar to what
I had
last week with Netvision?

- yba


On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, sara fink wrote:


Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:10:56 +0200
From: sara fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Israeli Linux mailing list <linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il>
Subject: major packet loss at hot server

Hello Everyone

I am having major problem with packet loss at some hot server that
sits in tel aviv. www.dnsstuff.com revealed this info.

I would like to know how many people suffer from this problem.

For this task mtr program is needed. The program can be downloaded
at
http://www.bitwizard.nl/mtr/ .

The description of the program is mtr combines the functionality
of the traceroute and ping programs in a single network diagnostic
tool.

As mtr starts, it investigates the network connection between the
host mtr runs on and HOSTNAME. by sending packets with purposly
low TTLs. It continues to send packets with low TTL, noting the
response time of the intervening routers. This allows mtr to print
the response percentage and response times of the internet route
to HOSTNAME. A sudden increase in packetloss or response time
is often an indication of a bad (or simply overloaded) link.

After installing this program please run the command mtr
google.com or
even mtr walla.co.il mtr ynet.co.il

I got in all 3 urls ~75% packet loss at ip 213.57.43.199 and at
213.57.43.22 (or 14) another ~20% packet loss.

Please inform me how many people suffer from this problem and who
is
their isp. Mine is 012. but the ips mentioned belong to hot.

I already talked with a nice technician at hot and he promissed to
give me an answer. Meanwhile at 012 tried to help me and in the
end he
told me it's a operating sytem problem. I just hate to hear such
stupid excuses. I tried bot with and without iptables and it's the
same. Instead of solving the problem they blame the OS. And all
this
happens with router or without.

Besides that, the first IP is actually border gateway.

Thanks for your help


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA ~. .~ Tk Open
Systems




=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=


- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -




=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5 83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA ~. .~ Tk Open
Systems

=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -




=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 --
  EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5  83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA    ~. .~   Tk Open
Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
      - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
 EE 77 7F 30 4A 64 2E C5  83 5F E7 49 A6 82 29 BA    ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
     - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to