That's interesting because my figures 15000 - 30000 hours is 2 - 4
years... that's fairly similar!

On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi
> 
> experience has shown that the disks in our HP machines live for round about 2 years 
>minimum and 5 years maximum, operating day by day.
> The air condition within the machines is very different and belongs to the 
>surrounding; but I haven't seen any differences between the MTBF of hot and cold 
>rooms (maybe they are to close to each other here).
> 
> Mostly (the data disks) start to have read and write errors, which increase from 
>week to week.
> 
> Greetings, Dietmar
> 
> >----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
> >Absender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Betreff: Re: Swap on raid
> >Empfänger: Dietmar Stein
> >Kopie-Empfänger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Datum: 12. Mai 1999 01:13
> >
> > 
> > Do other people have opinions on the "Lifetime" MTBF of a harddrive...  My
> > experience is about 15000 hours continuous operation.
> > 
> > I've seen manufacturers claim 300000 hours MTBF, but that's not realistic
> > in my experience... mabe 30000 in a more controlled environment with good
> > aircon etc....
> > 
> > Any other opinions?
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dietmar Stein wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > Ok - I understand what you are meaning; I think we have just different
> > > opinions towards lifetime of a harddrive.
> > > Maybe, I will go on using only one disk for swap - but it is interesting
> > > seeing other opinions concerning lifetime of a hdd and security.
> > > 
> > > Greetings, Dietmar
> > > 
> > > Luca Berra wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 07:26:53PM +0200, Dietmar Stein wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > At work we got much HP-Workstations and -Servers; everyone got a
> > > > > swap-partition which is of same size as physical memory (or even
> > > > > bigger).
> > > > hp-ux uses swap partitions as a dump device, something i'd love
> > > > to see on linux systems sooner or later.
> > > > 
> > > > anyway some swap space may be needed since there are process that allocate
> > > > tons of virtual memory, and they don't use it.
> > > > if the machine swaps occasionally i think it is acceptable
> > > > if i have to use swap i wan't it on a raid device.
> > > > 
> > > > L.
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >     Communications Media & Services S.r.l.
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > "For those about to rock - we salute you!"
> > > Dietmar Stein, Systemadministrator UNIX/Linux
> > > http://home.t-online.de/home/dstein2203
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > A.J. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > Linux boots, Windows Re-Boots.
> > Linux - Commoditising Operating Systems since 1991.
> > 
> > 
> 

A.J. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux boots, Windows Re-Boots.
Linux - Commoditising Operating Systems since 1991.

Reply via email to