Well, the reason we have our systems set to swap on RAID (we use RAID-1) is
that this improves our robustness. Even if one of our disks dies then the
swap continues to work and the system is still stable. Also, I believe, it
is possible to use a RAID-10 to stripe and mirror and actually improve swap
performance. With the new SCSI controllers you could probably approach
160MB/s swap speed. Not bad and a heck-of-a-lot better than a single disk at
~20MB/s. I've never tested the performance of this, like I said, we use RAID
for increased stability.
--Rainer
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Henry J. Cobb
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 9:00 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Swap on RAID
>
>
> Does anybody really want to wait while their swap data is
> duplicated out to
> multiple disks by a CPU that is working to free up memory to run
> applications?
>
> Isn't Swapping slow enough already?
>
> Why not simply swap on multiple disks, get Hardware RAID-5 for swap or buy
> RAM?
- Re: Swap on raid D. Lance Robinson
- Re: Swap on raid Dietmar Stein
- Re: Swap on raid A James Lewis
- Re: Swap on raid Luca Berra
- Re: Swap on raid Dietmar Stein
- Re: Swap on raid A James Lewis
- Re: Swap on raid dstein2203
- Re: Swap on raid A James Lewis
- Re: Swap on raid Dietmar Stein
- Swap on RAID Henry J. Cobb
- Re: Swap on RAID Rainer Mager
- Re: Swap on RAID Bill Carlson
- Re: Swap on RAID Michael