Jakob Østergaard wrote:
> 
> LVM can't do redundancy.  If you need flexible storage, go for LVM, if you need
> reliable storage go for RAID-1 or RAID-5.  You can, I presume, build a LVM over
> RAID-1/5 arrays, although I have *no* experience with LVM what so ever (yet).
> 

        Yes, this works well in 2.2.  I have LVM running over a 4
disk raid 5.  I haven't gotten this working in 2.3 yet however.  It
looks like the two drivers aren't sharing the request queue correctly.


Brian kress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to