Jakob Østergaard wrote: > > LVM can't do redundancy. If you need flexible storage, go for LVM, if you need > reliable storage go for RAID-1 or RAID-5. You can, I presume, build a LVM over > RAID-1/5 arrays, although I have *no* experience with LVM what so ever (yet). > Yes, this works well in 2.2. I have LVM running over a 4 disk raid 5. I haven't gotten this working in 2.3 yet however. It looks like the two drivers aren't sharing the request queue correctly. Brian kress [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- stability of software RAID under Linux Darren Evans
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Jakob Østergaard
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Brian Kress
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Holger Kiehl
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Edward Schernau
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Holger Kiehl
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Thomas Waldmann
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Eric Ladner
- raid5 disk failure Mustafa Bodur
- Re: raid5 disk failure Piete Brooks
- Re: raid5 disk failure Jakob Østergaard
- Re: raid5 disk failure James Manning
- RE: stability of software RAID under Linux Shaw, Marco