> Ok.  So, for the sake of simplicity (same interface and whatnot in 2.2 and 2.4)
> what's wrong with having to use DevFS in 2.2 as well?  It does exist, it's still

Stability, minimum change, maximum back compatibility. As has been pointed
out - keeping usbdevfs for 2.2 solves that


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to