On Fri, May 05, 2000 at 12:38:56AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Does this mean a 2.2 backport might ever make it into the official 2.2 tree? > > I dont think so. Ok. So, for the sake of simplicity (same interface and whatnot in 2.2 and 2.4) what's wrong with having to use DevFS in 2.2 as well? It does exist, it's still updated, and getting the usb stuff beat into it for the 2.2 backport shouldn't be hard. It also shouldn't be a requirement for usb to work at all, just some of the "fancy" stuff. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Johan Verrept
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Tom Rini
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Tom Rini
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Miles Lane
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (up... Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Alan Cox
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t Thomas Sailer
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated) David Brownell
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated) Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated) David Brownell
