Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)

[Johan Verrept]

Johan Verrept wrote:
> 
> "Dunlap, Randy" wrote:
> >
> > Johan,
> >
> > Do you still have a question about this?

One.
AFAICS all synchronous calls are compatibility wrappers and thus
deprecated.
Is synchronous against policy or is it because it usually isn't usefull
?

The more I think about it, synchronous indeed isn't nescessary.
The reason for the synchronous calls is that the Speedtouch contains a
statemachine that follows the state of the ADSL line. At the moment, it
is implemented as a thread.  The more I think about it, the more i feel
it doesn`t belong there and I am strongly considering to move it to
userspace. This would make configuration a lot easier too.
Opinions ?

        J.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]