Matthew Dharm wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 5 May 2000, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to see _more testing_ on everything.
> 
> One thing which I think is important is to make sure we test as many
> devices as we can on non-Intel platforms.
> 
> This may sound silly, but if we could find a specific set of people who
> would like to volunteer to test -- that is, specific people who would,
> every time a new patch comes out, test the code -- we might set up a
> second mailing list for just that work.
> 
> At least, I think it would be helpful to have a mailing list devoted to
> reports from a specific set of people (who are all knowledgable about how
> to capture logs, send useful reports, etc) who have a specific set of
> devices/platorms.  It's much easier to track down bugs when the bug
> reports are good -- that's one thing which I find myself continually
> asking/telling people who send me a report.

I'm happy to volunteer for testing Alpha and PPC.
I have the following devices (so far):

        ORB drive
        MS IntelliMouse Explorer
        Belkin multiport hub (serial/parallel+three USB)
        Belkin USB BusPort Mobile (Cardbus)
        Logitech Firstmouse Wheel
        Epson Perfection 636U (so far, untested by me)

I think that's it.

A few caveats, I cannot guarantee that I'll test every patch.
I test almost every pre-patch.  I do test every major patch.
I also have my daughter to look after, so I may be unavailable
for a day or two.  I also have yet to get Linux installed on
my PPC box.  I think I can get that done in the next couple
of days.  Lastly, since I uncover bugs in many parts
of the kernel (PCMCIA, etc.), I may sometimes be sidetracked
on nailing down a non-USB problem.

        Miles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to