Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)

[David Brownell]

> > But it's a change (two!), and you'd said the only change was
> > in the directory prefix.
> 
> One change of importance. The other "change" was an extension. I can
> hardly see that as a problem.

Mis-advertising is the problem, that's all.  This
failed the "binary compatible" test, for code which
correctly handled the single advertised change.

Even if it's a minor incompatibility, it's a pain to
have to spend days fixing things and retesting (!!)
in various configs to get back to the previous level
of functionality.  When you were told explicitly that
there was no need for such a time investment.

That's all.  It doesn't seem wrong to expect patch
descriptions to be accurate.

- Dave




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]