Re: [linux-usb] USB 2.3.99 jobs (updated)t

[Thomas Sailer]

Alan Cox wrote:

> It would be useful to use devfs just for USB here. I agree 100% that usbdevfs
> should be part of devfs though. I just dont plan to use devfs 8)

devfs lacks the infrastructure to do this. usbdevfs was specifically
invented
because I needed a revoke facility. Neither devfs, procfs nor VFS
provides 
that capability, and there was disinterest to add this to procfs (at a
time
where devfs wasn't in the kernel).

Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]