Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote: % On 01/29/03 19:42, Kurt Wall wrote: % >Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote: % >% % >% Redhat-7.0 had a seriously broken gcc implimentation. 8.0 has a beta % >% release of glibc. All the intermediate releases had no such problems, % >% and use standards compliant releases of gcc & glibc. % > % >I beg your pardon, but Red Hat 7.3 still used GCC 2.96: % >$ rpm -q redhat-release % >redhat-release-7.3-1 % >$ rpm -q gcc % >gcc-2.96-110 % % so?
The GCC project never released 2.96. It was a Red Hat thing. While it might have been "standards compliant" in the sense that it emitted code the complies with ANSI/ISO C and C++ standard, it was certainly not an official GCC release. Kurt -- To be intoxicated is to feel sophisticated but not be able to say it. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
